2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-D analysis of arch bridges using an elasto-plastic material model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular the assessment could be based commonly on limit analysis (Heyman 1982;Gilbert and Melbourne 1994;Boothby 1995) or nonlinear incremental techniques (Audenaert et al 2008;Brencich and De Francesco 2004;Molins and Roca 1998). The kinematic method, based on an adaptation of limit design for masonry structures, has proved to be a conceptually simple and robust procedure to verify the safety of masonry arch bridges under vertical loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular the assessment could be based commonly on limit analysis (Heyman 1982;Gilbert and Melbourne 1994;Boothby 1995) or nonlinear incremental techniques (Audenaert et al 2008;Brencich and De Francesco 2004;Molins and Roca 1998). The kinematic method, based on an adaptation of limit design for masonry structures, has proved to be a conceptually simple and robust procedure to verify the safety of masonry arch bridges under vertical loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, a large amount of literature regarding the analysis up to collapse of masonry arch bridges and masonry arches in general is present [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, such literature focuses almost exclusively on 1D/2D problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To have a prediction on displacements in the non-linear range, non-linear FE approaches (ranging from 1D up to full 3D) have thus been used in the recent past [8,[22][23][24]. For complex geometries, FEs models generally require many elements and variables, making the solution of the incremental problem difficult even for small bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limit analysis theorems associated with FEs, both in the static and kinematic version, are still the most effective and widespread procedure to estimate the collapse loads of one dimensional arches [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Indeed, limit analysis combines, on one hand, sufficient insight into collapse mechanisms, ultimate stress distributionsat least in critical sections -and load capacities, and on the other hand, simplicity to be cast into a practical computational tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%