2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper bound sequential linear programming mesh adaptation scheme for collapse analysis of masonry vaults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7], [8], [9]. In recent times, computer developments based on limit analysis methods have been developed, such as the Thrust Network Method which is grounded from lower bound theorems [10], [11], whereas FE limit analysis approaches with infinitely resistant elements and dissipation on interfaces used the concepts of the upper bound theorem [12], [13], [14]. In addition, FE commercial software combined with either elastic-plastic or damaging models, developed to study steel or concrete structures are often used in the technical literature to model masonry vaults [15], [16], [17].…”
Section: Several Advanced Computational Techniques Have Been Developementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7], [8], [9]. In recent times, computer developments based on limit analysis methods have been developed, such as the Thrust Network Method which is grounded from lower bound theorems [10], [11], whereas FE limit analysis approaches with infinitely resistant elements and dissipation on interfaces used the concepts of the upper bound theorem [12], [13], [14]. In addition, FE commercial software combined with either elastic-plastic or damaging models, developed to study steel or concrete structures are often used in the technical literature to model masonry vaults [15], [16], [17].…”
Section: Several Advanced Computational Techniques Have Been Developementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, over the past few decades a growing interest has developed in studying their behaviour up to collapse and assessing their ultimate load capacity. Significant laboratory and in-situ tests were carried out [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and different analytical and numerical descriptions were proposed [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Current modelling strategies for arches in masonry bridges are mainly based upon the use of limit analysis concepts [20][21][22], the finite element method (FEM) [13,24,25,26,27], the discrete element method [23] or discontinuous modelling techniques [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard yield line pattern adopted is informed by experimental observations from our own tests, as well as those from Kelman and Spence [21] and Sinha [34]. It is acknowledged that a general procedure for identifying optimum yield patterns requires a more complex approach such as the Sequential Linear Programming algorithm adopted by Milani [48].…”
Section: Application Of Yield Line Analysis To Masonry Subject To Hydmentioning
confidence: 99%