Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century 2007
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232024.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2 Clausewitz and the Non‐Linear Nature of Warfare: Systems of Organized Complexity

Abstract: Clausewitz availed himself of the physics and mathematics terminology of his time, some of which addressed problems of simplicity with Newtonian concepts, while some treated problems of disorganized complexity with new tools of probability calculation. These idealizations did not capture what Clausewitz saw as the essential features of war and a theory of war, so he also incorporated terms and ideas from the emerging fields of chemistry and biology. Today, we would say he was grappling with problems of organiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clausewitz explained friction with the help of game analogies and was a great supporter of regular, complex, and realistic planning exercises and war games. He compared friction itself to a game of cards, as there is an element of chance that can be managed with skill, leadership, and an ability to read opponents (Beyerchen :53). Clausewitz does not appear to think friction was unintelligible to those who had not seen war and also that games may be the best peacetime analog of war, at least in this respect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clausewitz explained friction with the help of game analogies and was a great supporter of regular, complex, and realistic planning exercises and war games. He compared friction itself to a game of cards, as there is an element of chance that can be managed with skill, leadership, and an ability to read opponents (Beyerchen :53). Clausewitz does not appear to think friction was unintelligible to those who had not seen war and also that games may be the best peacetime analog of war, at least in this respect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, those interested in rational choice or other process models can use the example of the extent to which games change when costs and payoffs are uncertain and information is incomplete to demonstrate the concepts. And while not all will agree with Beyerschen that Clausewitz's On War is an excellent example of nonlinear theory with broad political science implications, any political assessment where information is incomplete and interactive and feedback effects are likely can benefit from a clear understanding of the implications of fog and friction (Beyerchen ).…”
Section: Educational Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the structure and dynamics of complex systems chaos theory can be applied to provide insights into nonlinear phenomena (including random aspects). In chaos theory, determinism and chance are like two sides of the same coin, and there is no cause and effect relationship between them (GLEICK, 1987;ÇAMBEL, 1993;WILLIAMS, 1997;SPROTT, 2000;BERTUGLIA and VAIO, 2005;BEYERCHEN, 2007;LASKEY and COSTA, 2009).…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, "as technology has evolved, so has the need and desire to create better and more efficient weapons and associated launch systems that can break through or neutralize an opponent's defenses" (SLOFER, 2022). This is the case of autonomous technology (underwater, in focus) if used in a way that causes significant wear due to the possibility of penetrating the opposing defense ( Considering only the proportion of an attack by the use of weapons of the nuclear category, the consequences for the earth system would already be "catastrophic" -however, there are empirical and antagonistic opinions on the conception of such a circumstance due to the relativization of its concept (KAHN et al 1976;CAPRA, 1982;CAPRA, 1983;KAHN, 2007;BEYERCHEN, 2007 Indeed, there is a "self-regulation" feature of the Earth system (to its long-term dynamic equilibrium) however it is still not well understood by science mostly if the cause of the changes or disturbances are the human activities (SKINNER and MURCK, 2011). The human impact on the environment can overload the © 2022 Global Journals Autonomous Technology in Scenario by Rare Geophysical Processes (Underwater Focus) 2 One can only "imagine" the despair of the survivors of a nuclear catastrophe -according to the relativization of the conceptual conception; or not -considering themselves as human beings in crisis or under pressure.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%