2014 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2014.6757329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.3 60Gb/s NRZ and PAM4 transmitters for 400GbE in 65nm CMOS

Abstract: Recent research indicates that data-link transceivers running at or below 40Gb/s are practical to implement in CMOS technology [1]. However, next-generation datacom and telecom systems require transceivers to operate at even higher data rates. For example, a 400Gb/s Ethernet system may need 8×50Gb/s PAM2 (NRZ) or PAM4 channels [2]. This paper introduces fully integrated solutions for NRZ and PAM4 transmitters. The 60Gb/s operating speed demonstrates sufficient bandwidth even for standards with coding overhead.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short-distance applications such as backplane and chip-to-chip data links have similar approaches. Recent research also demonstrates the feasibility of realizing 48 60 Gb/s NRZ transmitters (TXs) in CMOS technologies [2], [3]. Meanwhile, transmitter equalization for electrical and optical channel loss has been shown at similar data rate [4], [5], and receivers (RXs) with decision-feedback equalizers (DFEs) have been announced as well [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Short-distance applications such as backplane and chip-to-chip data links have similar approaches. Recent research also demonstrates the feasibility of realizing 48 60 Gb/s NRZ transmitters (TXs) in CMOS technologies [2], [3]. Meanwhile, transmitter equalization for electrical and optical channel loss has been shown at similar data rate [4], [5], and receivers (RXs) with decision-feedback equalizers (DFEs) have been announced as well [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data swing is quite limited after equalization. Furthermore, the timing requirement for data and clock alignment in the transmitter becomes so stringent that a dynamic aligner becomes mandatory [3]. Finally, to the authors' best knowledge, no CMOS CDR circuit has ever been reported at such a high data rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fastest published SST drivers [3][4][5] accomplish low power consumption and low jitter, and operate in the data rate range adequate for the 28Gb/s standard generation (OIF-CEI-25G-LR, OIF-CEI-28G-VSR). To continue to exploit the high power efficiency and high voltage swing in the 50Gb/s generation applications and incoming standards (OIF-CEI-56G-VSR), SST drivers should be demonstrated that operate in the range of the fastest CML drivers [6,7,8] with sufficient output swing and return loss performance. In this paper we demonstrate a 2:1 multiplexer and a SST driver with such features by using a simple static CMOS design style without the passive components except in the termination, allowing for compact layout and high frequency of operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous standards for these networking applications use NRZ signaling. However, practical signal integrity constraints have led to a renewed interest in also supporting PAM4 for some applications and loss profiles [1][2]. Recently, several transmitters have been reported that operate between 28 and 60Gb/s using NRZ or PAM4 modulation exclusively [2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, practical signal integrity constraints have led to a renewed interest in also supporting PAM4 for some applications and loss profiles [1][2]. Recently, several transmitters have been reported that operate between 28 and 60Gb/s using NRZ or PAM4 modulation exclusively [2][3][4]. However, high-speed SerDes building blocks that support both a wide frequency range and multiple forms of modulation provide more compatibility between components and avoid the development of multiple IPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%