2000
DOI: 10.1006/exer.1999.0812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H Spin–Spin Relaxation in Normal and Cataractous Human, Normal Fish and Bird Eye Lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this very short component cannot be seen in an imaging experiment with a minimum TE of approximately15 msec. For a normal lens, and performing only a single exponential fit, Racz et al (24) report a value of T 2 ϭ 26.98 Ϯ 0.04 msec, which is in excellent agreement with the values found here for both the enucleated (25.0 Ϯ 0.2 msec) and in vivo (25.0 Ϯ 0.4 msec) eye measurements. A detailed physiological explanation of the multiple compartments in the lens is given by Moffat and Pope (25) but is beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, this very short component cannot be seen in an imaging experiment with a minimum TE of approximately15 msec. For a normal lens, and performing only a single exponential fit, Racz et al (24) report a value of T 2 ϭ 26.98 Ϯ 0.04 msec, which is in excellent agreement with the values found here for both the enucleated (25.0 Ϯ 0.2 msec) and in vivo (25.0 Ϯ 0.4 msec) eye measurements. A detailed physiological explanation of the multiple compartments in the lens is given by Moffat and Pope (25) but is beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the most likely explanation for the differences between our data and those of earlier measurements is that in our case we look at segments of the lens while Stankiewicz (1989) and Racz et al (2000) measured the relaxation of whole lenses. Thus our seven lens segments, from anterior cortex to nucleus to posterior cortex, each represented a more homogeneous sample than the whole lens of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Depending on the ®tting of the relaxation curves, NMR measurements may perceive one or up to three different forms of water. Stankiewicz et al (1989) and Racz et al (2000) ®tted their T 2 relaxation of different lenses with a two-term exponential equation and therefore, they calculated relaxation times as well as concentrations of two component systems in the lens. Stankiewicz et al (1989) ®tted the T 1 relaxation of their animal lenses with one-term exponential expression but used the proportions of a two component system gained from analysis of the T 2 relaxation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation for this paradox maybe due to the fact that in a tissue with such short T1 and T2 constants, the MRI is much more sensitive to the free water content and not the water bound to proteins. 60 Hence, the increase in water content induced by inhibiting the circulation system with ouabain could be explained by an abrupt and localized release of water that is normally bound to proteins in the lens core. This idea is supported by the observation that the ratio of free to bound water gradually increases in human lenses with advancing age and this change is more pronounced in cataractic lenses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%