2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4795006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H relaxation dispersion in solutions of nitroxide radicals: Influence of electron spin relaxation

Abstract: The work presents a theory of nuclear ((1)H) spin-lattice relaxation dispersion for solutions of (15)N and (14)N radicals, including electron spin relaxation effects. The theory is a generalization of the approach presented by Kruk et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 137, 044512 (2012)]. The electron spin relaxation is attributed to the anisotropic part of the electron spin-nitrogen spin hyperfine interaction modulated by rotational dynamics of the paramagnetic molecule, and described by means of Redfield relaxation theory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the uncertainty in the translational correlation time, it differs fundamentally from that measured from nitroxide spin-labeled phospholipids reported earlier . Because the field dependence for these paramagnetic cases was not logarithmic, a three-dimensional model was used to interpret the data and yielded a translational correlation time for the interface that was 3–4 times slower than bulk water. In contrast, the logarithmic field dependence implies a two-dimensional translational model and the much weaker dipolar coupling localizes more strongly the depth of the interfacial region that drives the spin relaxation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In spite of the uncertainty in the translational correlation time, it differs fundamentally from that measured from nitroxide spin-labeled phospholipids reported earlier . Because the field dependence for these paramagnetic cases was not logarithmic, a three-dimensional model was used to interpret the data and yielded a translational correlation time for the interface that was 3–4 times slower than bulk water. In contrast, the logarithmic field dependence implies a two-dimensional translational model and the much weaker dipolar coupling localizes more strongly the depth of the interfacial region that drives the spin relaxation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…27,28 The rotational component can be included phenomenologically with a Lorentzian spectral density J rot (ω n ,τ c ), with τ c as the rotational correlation time. 13,29 As previously predicted for water 10,31 and observed in organic solvents, 32 the coupling factor ξ 1 H at room temperature for small organic radicals is mainly dependent on translational diffusion, and including a rotational contribution introduces an overparameterization. 33,34 Therefore, as a first approximation, we assume k rot = 0 for TP, leaving only the translational diffusion component in eq 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The rotational contribution of the dipolar relaxation becomes larger for slower rotations, as previously observed in high-viscosity liquids. 29,36 This is the case in FN-na (where n is the number of adducts), with rotational correlation times τ c EPR larger than τ D (Table 1). The rotational dynamics of the solvent molecules are much faster, being τ c < 2 ps for both toluene 37 and chloroform, 38 meaning that their contribution can be neglected at this magnetic field (τ c ω n ≪ 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sPRE, the Lorentzian spectral density is flawed because in the low frequency limit, as a result of translational diffusion, the spectral density behaves as: 43,44,[49][50][51][52][53][54] lim ω 0…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%