2020
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c00747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Interpretation of Solvent Paramagnetic Relaxation for Probing Protein–Cosolute Interactions

Abstract: Protein-small cosolute molecule interactions are ubiquitous and known to modulate the solubility, stability, and function of many proteins. Characterization of such transient weak interactions at atomic resolution remains challenging. In this work, we develop a simple and practical NMR method for extracting both energetic and dynamic information on protein-cosolute interactions from solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (sPRE) measurements. Our procedure is based on an approximate (non-Lorentzian) spectr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tetramethyl nitroxide compounds such as PROXYL or TEMPOL are known to preferentially interact with hydrophobic patches on protein surface (23,26,27). Because the hydrophobic moiety of PROXYL is identical for the two PROXYL derivatives, it is likely that the hydrophobic contribution in each U term is approximately cancelled in ΔU ENS .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tetramethyl nitroxide compounds such as PROXYL or TEMPOL are known to preferentially interact with hydrophobic patches on protein surface (23,26,27). Because the hydrophobic moiety of PROXYL is identical for the two PROXYL derivatives, it is likely that the hydrophobic contribution in each U term is approximately cancelled in ΔU ENS .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sPREs this expression is approximate, with the quantitative relationship between Eq. 2 and solvent PRE being somewhat more complicated ( Okuno et al, 2020 ), and yet this formulation has been employed with some success. In this vein, our residue-based water-edited SSNMR-derived surface area data are fit to values computed from molecular structure using Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compound is a conjugate of OAc − and a paramagnetic group, 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-pyrrolidinooxy (PROXYL). Recently, for ubiquitin, Okuno et al used carboxy-PROXYL and its neutral analog, carbamoyl-PROXYL to observe weak protein–cosolute interactions through PRE measurements ( 35 ). This type of PRE, which is conventionally referred to as solvent PRE, occurs through dipole–dipole interactions between the unpaired electrons of the cosolutes and nuclei of a protein ( 36 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, protein 1 H nuclei near the molecular surface exhibit large PRE arising from paramagnetic cosolutes. If the paramagnetic cosolutes are distributed uniformly around the protein, the PRE profile can be predicted from the protein structure using an empirical approach proposed by Pintacuda and Otting ( 37 ) and by Hernández et al ( 38 ) However, for nitroxide compounds involving a tetramethyl moiety (e.g., TEMPOL, PROXYL, and their derivatives), the spatial distribution around a protein is known to be nonuniform and biased due to hydrophobic interactions with apolar patches on protein surfaces ( 35 , 37 ). A similar bias in the spatial distribution of PROXYL derivatives may also occur on DNA surfaces ( 39 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%