2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0161-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG uptake in the stomach on screening PET/CT: value for predicting Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic atrophic gastritis

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the value of 18F-FDG uptake on screening PET/CT images for the prediction of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and chronic atrophic gastritis.MethodsAmong subjects who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for cancer screening from April 2005 to November 2015, PET/CT images were analyzed in 88 subjects who had gastrointestinal fiberscopy within 6 months. The volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed in the fornix, corpus and antrum of the stomach to determine maximal st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not a function of smaller tumour size as the average size of 18F-FDG negative tumours is close to 4 cm, with the smallest tumour measuring 1 cm. Additionally, physiological or inflammatory uptake in non-malignant gastric mucosa, for example, induced by Helicobacter pylori infection, can obscure a gastric cancer and provide difficulty with primary tumour identification [35]. Furthermore, more than half of the FDG PET-CT scans reported incidental findings, leading to additional tests and MDT discussion, which resulted in delays to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a function of smaller tumour size as the average size of 18F-FDG negative tumours is close to 4 cm, with the smallest tumour measuring 1 cm. Additionally, physiological or inflammatory uptake in non-malignant gastric mucosa, for example, induced by Helicobacter pylori infection, can obscure a gastric cancer and provide difficulty with primary tumour identification [35]. Furthermore, more than half of the FDG PET-CT scans reported incidental findings, leading to additional tests and MDT discussion, which resulted in delays to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delineation on CT only is challenging, mainly in differentiating tumor from normal tissue at the cranial and caudal tumor borders. Delineation on FDG-PET/CT may help in determining these tumor borders; however, FDG uptake does not differentiate between tumor and inflammation, which can be difficult especially in tumors involving the GEJ 35, 36. Furthermore, on FDG-PET/CT the target volume can depend on the threshold chosen and may increase or decrease depending on the windowing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stomach physiologically accumulates FDG especially in the fundus and body but scarce in the antrum 8 . Although HP infection has been reported to show higher SUV compared with non‐HP‐infected stomach on the FDG‐PET, non‐HP‐infected stomach occasionally accumulates FDG 4‐9 . The accumulation of FDG in the fundic gland region was caused by fundic redness but not the other change such as erosion or hematin 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although HP infection has been reported to show higher SUV compared with non-HP-infected stomach on the FDG-PET, non-HP-infected stomach occasionally accumulates FDG. [4][5][6][7][8][9] The accumulation of FDG in the fundic gland region was caused by fundic redness but not the other change such as erosion or hematin. 6 HP eradication could improve the mucosal atrophy in the long term 14 but the time course depends on the atrophic degree and duration of the HP infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation