Epidemiology 2018
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-icohabstracts.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1554 Estimation of the global burden of mesothelioma deaths from incomplete national mortality data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, many lower -income countries have not yet acquired the technology/infrastructure to diagnose and report mesothelioma and thus may be “missing” the disease burden. It is important for countries lacking mesothelioma data to utilize these estimates; that said, it is also important that they understand the method of imputation to derive the estimates (e.g., asbestos use is commonly imputed) as well as their limitations [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, many lower -income countries have not yet acquired the technology/infrastructure to diagnose and report mesothelioma and thus may be “missing” the disease burden. It is important for countries lacking mesothelioma data to utilize these estimates; that said, it is also important that they understand the method of imputation to derive the estimates (e.g., asbestos use is commonly imputed) as well as their limitations [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on data reported by 83 member states of the WHO, the worldwide age-adjusted mortality rate of mesothelioma increased 5.4% annually from 1994 to 2008 [ 9 ]. An updated analysis continued to show a general increase of the age-adjusted mortality rate, based on data judged to be “reliable” from 59 member states [ 10 ]. A GBD study estimated an 82% increase in global mesothelioma deaths from 1990 to 2016 [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MPM is considered to be rare in comparison to other cancer types, the global incidence of MPM has increased significantly worldwide due to the past widespread and augmented use of asbestos in building materials over the past century. As such, The World Health Organisation estimates that approximately 125 million people are exposed annually worldwide to the carcinogenic mineral fibres in both the workplace and at home; accounting for an estimated 38,000 to 43,000 mesothelioma-related deaths each year [4][5][6]. There are few effective biomarkers and treatment options available to MPM patients in the clinical setting, attributing to a poor associated median survival of only 12-18 months following first-line standard chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%