1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022637815797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This paper describes four studies on self-reported problems in 2,243 adolescent males and females, 12 to 17 years of age. In Study 1, principal-axis factoring of 102 items covering 11 problem domains revealed six factors comprising 49.5% of the variance. Study 2 used confirmatory factor analysis of a 64-item reduced set on a new sample of 408 adolescents. Goodness-of-fit indicators suggested that the six-factor model had excellent fit to the data. Study 3 used data from the 2,157 adolescents used in the first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interested parents first completed a telephone screen to evaluate exclusionary criteria (see below). If eligible, the family was invited to complete the stage 2 diagnostic assessment, which included parent and teacher ratings on the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale (Reid et al, 1998) and the Conners’ Rating Scale – Revised Short Form (Conners et al, 1997). Parents also completed the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-E (KSADS-E; Kaufman et al, 1997) with a trained master’s level clinical interviewer to evaluate ADHD and other major psychiatric disorders for each child (i.e., disruptive behavior disorders, major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, specific and social phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post- traumatic stress disorder among others).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested parents first completed a telephone screen to evaluate exclusionary criteria (see below). If eligible, the family was invited to complete the stage 2 diagnostic assessment, which included parent and teacher ratings on the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale (Reid et al, 1998) and the Conners’ Rating Scale – Revised Short Form (Conners et al, 1997). Parents also completed the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-E (KSADS-E; Kaufman et al, 1997) with a trained master’s level clinical interviewer to evaluate ADHD and other major psychiatric disorders for each child (i.e., disruptive behavior disorders, major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, specific and social phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post- traumatic stress disorder among others).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TD children were excluded for t-scores ≥ 65 on the Conners’ Rating Scale-Revised: Long Version (CPRS-R:L,(Conners et al, 1997)). Participants with ADHD were included if they had a Conners’ Total ADHD score ≥ 65 according to a parent in conjunction with a significant indication of ADHD on a structured clinical interview.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short form of the Conners-Wells Self-Report Scale (CASS-S; α= 0.90) (27) was used to assess attention deficit and hyperactivity symptoms. This 27-item scale asks participants to rate items (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%