2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006448311976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We report on a 33-year-old woman with carcinomatous meningitis due to carcinoma of the breast who developed multiple cerebral infarctions within four days after intrathecal chemotherapy with methotrexate. MR angiography revealed a narrowing of basal cerebral arteries, which is consistent with vasculopathy. The vasculopathy was probably due to carcinomatous meningitis itself, an acute toxic effect of methotrexate, or a combination of both.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 6 , 7 , 10 , 14 , 21 ] To explain the pathogenesis of such an extraordinary event, several hypotheses have been formulated, including flow obstruction of small arteries by extrinsic (high subarachnoid neoplastic cell density) and/or luminal (neoplastic cell emboli) factors. [ 4 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 13 ] In our patient, once LMC was verified by biopsy, we interpreted the findings in the imaging tests as highly suggestive of vascular wall involvement of the right MCA and its branches by neoplastic cells [ Figure 1 ] as the main mechanism triggering cerebral ischemia, despite the lack of direct pathological support, since biopsy of large caliber arteries was abandoned to avoid further severe complications in the patient. Vasospasm has also been suggested as a potential cause of the angiographic changes associated with LMC,[ 7 ] so we cannot rule out that this dynamic process contributed to a certain extent to the cerebral ischemia developed by our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[ 6 , 7 , 10 , 14 , 21 ] To explain the pathogenesis of such an extraordinary event, several hypotheses have been formulated, including flow obstruction of small arteries by extrinsic (high subarachnoid neoplastic cell density) and/or luminal (neoplastic cell emboli) factors. [ 4 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 13 ] In our patient, once LMC was verified by biopsy, we interpreted the findings in the imaging tests as highly suggestive of vascular wall involvement of the right MCA and its branches by neoplastic cells [ Figure 1 ] as the main mechanism triggering cerebral ischemia, despite the lack of direct pathological support, since biopsy of large caliber arteries was abandoned to avoid further severe complications in the patient. Vasospasm has also been suggested as a potential cause of the angiographic changes associated with LMC,[ 7 ] so we cannot rule out that this dynamic process contributed to a certain extent to the cerebral ischemia developed by our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%