1964
DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(64)90428-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

137. Acidic surface oxides on carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 lists the acid and base values of the chemically treated ACs. As for the lithium ion adsorption using the ACs from aqueous solution, it was announced in previous studies that the surface functionality is more important than even pore structure [31]. Table 4 indicates that the chemical treatments both H 3 PO 4 and KOH produce a considerable amount of acidic surface groups.…”
Section: Zeta Potential and Functional Groupsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 4 lists the acid and base values of the chemically treated ACs. As for the lithium ion adsorption using the ACs from aqueous solution, it was announced in previous studies that the surface functionality is more important than even pore structure [31]. Table 4 indicates that the chemical treatments both H 3 PO 4 and KOH produce a considerable amount of acidic surface groups.…”
Section: Zeta Potential and Functional Groupsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To understand the mass gain or loss of the post-hydrolysis residue (PHR), yields of proximate components were calculated using the data obtained from proximate analysis of the PHR and residual solids yield. Post hydrolsate residue samples were also analyzed for its total acid density adopting the procedure employed by Boehm et.al (Boehm et al, 1964). About 0.2 g of the sample was added with 50 mL (V B ) standardized 0.05 M NaOH solution and mixed thoroughly for 24 h at 200 rpm in an incubator shaker.…”
Section: Yields Of Proximate Components and Acid Sites In Phrmentioning
confidence: 99%