2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

13.7% Efficiency graphene–gallium arsenide Schottky junction solar cells with a P3HT hole transport layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extracted ideality factors of NRI composites are presented in Table 2. Out of four devices, NRI-12 M device shows the lowest n closer to ideality, which confirms the better charge performance of this device [3,37]. This type of rather high n values is often encountered for organic semiconductors [38,39].…”
Section: Investigation Of Saturation Current Density Ideality Factorsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The extracted ideality factors of NRI composites are presented in Table 2. Out of four devices, NRI-12 M device shows the lowest n closer to ideality, which confirms the better charge performance of this device [3,37]. This type of rather high n values is often encountered for organic semiconductors [38,39].…”
Section: Investigation Of Saturation Current Density Ideality Factorsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Nevertheless, previous reports of improvements in V OC and FF with the addition a conducting polymer interlayer into graphene-Si solar cell have also observed an increased f B upon interlayer incorporation. 30 The increase in FF, V OC , J Sat , and improvement in diode qualities indicate that the interlayer may acting as the HTL and electron blocking layer (EBL) at the same time.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)). [30][31][32][33][34] In this report, we explore the potential of employing spiro-OMeTAD as an interlayer between transparent conducting electrode of GOCNT and Si (GOCNT/spiro-OMeTAD/Si). Control devices without the HTL were fabricated, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the PCE of these cells are still much lower than that of state‐of‐the‐art crystalline Si solar cells. Interface engineering is crucial in Schottky heterostructures based on graphene, as already reported for graphene/GaAs, graphene/InP, and graphene/CdTe solar cell . The performance of graphene/n‐Si SBSCs is highly affected by the recombination of the charge carriers at the interface between graphene and Si due to the low Schottky barrier height (≈0.6–0.7 eV), much smaller than that of traditional Si solar cells, which causes a large leakage current and thus a low open circuit voltage ( V oc ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%