2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

12 Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes in Japanese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This comparison found only 10 matches(Table 3), while 89 (89.9%) haplotypes were not previously recorded.The gene diversity of DYS385a/b is usually highest among Y-chromosomal STR loci(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) but in this study the diversity of DYS456 (0.6749), DYS389II (0.6474), DYS635 (0.5525), and Y GATA H4 (0.5653) was higher than that of DYS385a/b (0.5320). This comparison found only 10 matches(Table 3), while 89 (89.9%) haplotypes were not previously recorded.The gene diversity of DYS385a/b is usually highest among Y-chromosomal STR loci(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) but in this study the diversity of DYS456 (0.6749), DYS389II (0.6474), DYS635 (0.5525), and Y GATA H4 (0.5653) was higher than that of DYS385a/b (0.5320).…”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
“…This comparison found only 10 matches(Table 3), while 89 (89.9%) haplotypes were not previously recorded.The gene diversity of DYS385a/b is usually highest among Y-chromosomal STR loci(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) but in this study the diversity of DYS456 (0.6749), DYS389II (0.6474), DYS635 (0.5525), and Y GATA H4 (0.5653) was higher than that of DYS385a/b (0.5320). This comparison found only 10 matches(Table 3), while 89 (89.9%) haplotypes were not previously recorded.The gene diversity of DYS385a/b is usually highest among Y-chromosomal STR loci(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) but in this study the diversity of DYS456 (0.6749), DYS389II (0.6474), DYS635 (0.5525), and Y GATA H4 (0.5653) was higher than that of DYS385a/b (0.5320).…”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Further, our Y-STR haplotype population data was compared with Korean data (n = 301) [23] and Japanese population data (n = 381) previously reported by Hashiyada et al [12] using all markers analyzed both in our and their studies, except for the DYS385 marker (i.e. DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438 and DYS439).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The 16 Y-STR haplotyping appears to have a high potential for differentiating between Japanese individuals. Data for the Y-STR of the Japanese population have been reported [7][8][9][10][11][12]. The population data in this study consisted of the largest number of Y-STR markers and individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our present haplotype data were compared with the previously published data available by means of AMOVA analysis based on pairwise R st comparisons in samples from Tibetan Living in Tibet Lassa [5], from Tibetan in China [6], from Tibetan in Tibet [7], from Han population residing in the Ningxia province of China [8], from Minnan Han Chinese in Southeast China [9], from Chinese population in Hong Kong [10], from Chinese Uigur ethnic group [11], from Chinese Mongol ethnic group [12], from Chinese Yi ethnic minority group [13], Chinese Salar ethnic group [14], from Japanese [15], from southern populations in Korea [16], from Bangladeshi population [17], and from Basque population [18], and the results were shown in Table 2. The comparative …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%