2020
DOI: 10.9771/ccrh.v33i0.33331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMPLEMENTANDO A PARTICIPAÇÃO PÚBLICA NO BRASIL: Sociologia de atores secundários

Abstract: <p class="Corpo">As instituições participativas brasileiras foram analisadas por uma densa literatura que estudou os projetos subjacentes a essas mesmas instituições, o engajamento dos cidadãos e os efeitos variáveis da participação sobre o campo político. Porém, a literatura pouco questionou o papel dos profissionais da participação, ou seja a atuação dos atores específicos que são pagos para conceber, organizar e facilitar as instituições participativas. Este artigo, baseado numa metodologia qualitativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have essentially shown that in various national contexts (for a comparative summary, see Bherer et al., 2016), ‘professional groups’ (Petitjean, 2017) and even a ‘participation market’ (Hendriks and Carson, 2008; Lee, 2014; Mazeaud and Nonjon, 2018) have emerged. Some of these studies have looked into the nature of the profiles and practices of civil servants whose day-to-day task is to set up, facilitate, organise or even evaluate these experiments (on Switzerland, see Kübler et al., 2020; on the UK, see Escobar, 2015; on France, see Gourgues, 2012; on Brazil, see Sa Vilas Boas, 2020; on Belgium, see Bottin, 2020). We propose to focus here on the very process of administering participation through the prism of the ‘politics of organisation’, defined as ‘the distribution of tasks, roles and responsibilities within state administrations or, more generically, the modes of specialisation of public organisations’ (Bezes and Le Lidec, 2016: 407).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have essentially shown that in various national contexts (for a comparative summary, see Bherer et al., 2016), ‘professional groups’ (Petitjean, 2017) and even a ‘participation market’ (Hendriks and Carson, 2008; Lee, 2014; Mazeaud and Nonjon, 2018) have emerged. Some of these studies have looked into the nature of the profiles and practices of civil servants whose day-to-day task is to set up, facilitate, organise or even evaluate these experiments (on Switzerland, see Kübler et al., 2020; on the UK, see Escobar, 2015; on France, see Gourgues, 2012; on Brazil, see Sa Vilas Boas, 2020; on Belgium, see Bottin, 2020). We propose to focus here on the very process of administering participation through the prism of the ‘politics of organisation’, defined as ‘the distribution of tasks, roles and responsibilities within state administrations or, more generically, the modes of specialisation of public organisations’ (Bezes and Le Lidec, 2016: 407).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%