2017
DOI: 10.7784/rbtur.v11i2.1237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo sistêmico da paisagem no empreendimento turístico “Ilha de Porto Belo” em Santa Catarina, Brasil, na perspectiva de sua sustentabilidade

Abstract: O estudo teve como objetivo analisar os aspectos naturais da Ilha de Porto Belo em Santa Catarina, bem como sua relação com os atrativos do complexo turístico nela implantado. A justificativa aponta para a expectativa de uma contribuição metodológica e empírica, com a revelação das relações entre os recursos ecossistêmicos e os processos relacionados aos atrativos deste destino, sob o paradigma da sustentabilidade do turismo. No tocante à metodologia, a pesquisa foi do tipo descritiva, de caráter quali-quantit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this article are in agreement with Vieira et al (2007), who affirm that the landscape preference of valuators is associated with the natu ralness of the landscape as well as the balance and harmony between the elements. These results are also in agreement with Canteras (1992), in which the diversity of elements, forming a landscape variety, has more value than a homogeneous landscape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results presented in this article are in agreement with Vieira et al (2007), who affirm that the landscape preference of valuators is associated with the natu ralness of the landscape as well as the balance and harmony between the elements. These results are also in agreement with Canteras (1992), in which the diversity of elements, forming a landscape variety, has more value than a homogeneous landscape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%