2019
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors' Reply – Comments: Influence of the prone position on a stretcher for pregnant women on maternal and fetal hemodynamic parameters and comfort in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latest gestation at which proning was described in a critically ill patient is 34 weeks in singleton (14). However, studies in healthy individuals that evaluated maternal-fetal hemodynamic parameters are described as far as 37 weeks (15). None of our patients that were proned suffered any complications during proning.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latest gestation at which proning was described in a critically ill patient is 34 weeks in singleton (14). However, studies in healthy individuals that evaluated maternal-fetal hemodynamic parameters are described as far as 37 weeks (15). None of our patients that were proned suffered any complications during proning.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Contrary to the common concern of aortocaval compression during the prone position in pregnancy, the prone position provides optimal venous return (19). No clinically significant hemodynamic changes occurred during proning in healthy subjects (15) or those with hypertensive disorders (20).…”
Section: Hemodynamic Changesmentioning
confidence: 96%