2017
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(08)03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:This study compared the results of the caloric test with those of the video head impulse test obtained during the same session and evaluated whether the former can be used to screen for non-acute vestibular dysfunction.METHODS:A total of 157 participants complaining of dizziness with vestibular characteristics of varying durations and clinical courses completed the caloric test and video head impulse test.RESULTS:Significantly more caloric test results than video head impulse test results were abnorm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpreting vHIT exams is more clear-cut, and detecting new overt or covert saccades in the postoperative period, or drop in the gain of head movement/eye movement to <0.6, should be recognized as vestibular damage. However, the sensitivity of vHIT is a matter for further research and many papers indicate that, among patients with vestibular neuritis or other symptoms suggestive of impairment, a lower percentage have vestibular damage detected by vHIT than by the caloric test (39)(40)(41). The same discrepancy was observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Interpreting vHIT exams is more clear-cut, and detecting new overt or covert saccades in the postoperative period, or drop in the gain of head movement/eye movement to <0.6, should be recognized as vestibular damage. However, the sensitivity of vHIT is a matter for further research and many papers indicate that, among patients with vestibular neuritis or other symptoms suggestive of impairment, a lower percentage have vestibular damage detected by vHIT than by the caloric test (39)(40)(41). The same discrepancy was observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our experience with dizziness at our clinical practice is that the sensitivity in detecting vestibular impairment between the CT and vHIT was 3:1 15. Our hypothesis was that in contrast to our observations with chronic vestibular diseases vHIT could be proportionally more sensitive in specific cases, like CI recipients'.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These cells are connected to regular afferent neural fibres. Our previous experience with patients suffering from dizziness in our neurotology practice suggests that the sensitivity of the CT and vHIT in detecting vestibular impairment was at a 3:1 proportion 15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, the extent of hydrops correlates with the extent of caloric weakness with normal VHIT tests. 7,12,14 Choi et al of 2007 also pointed out the same discrepency. In our study also caloric tests showed better sensitivity compared to VHIT especially in patients with chronic complaints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%