2015
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(07)11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ischemia-modified albumin must be evaluated as an oxidative stress marker together with albumin and bilirubin in individuals with acute appendicitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, subgroup analyses revealed significantly higher serum IMA levels in patients diagnosed with AA compared with the control group. Several previous studies support this expected finding [18][19][20][21][22]. is can be explained in terms of ischemia occurring in AA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, subgroup analyses revealed significantly higher serum IMA levels in patients diagnosed with AA compared with the control group. Several previous studies support this expected finding [18][19][20][21][22]. is can be explained in terms of ischemia occurring in AA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), calculated through the evaluation of the binding of cobalt to albumin, is a new biomarker for ischemia. A level of IMA is also detected in diseases related to oxidative stress, such as psoriasis, vascular injury of diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, some cancers, acute appendicitis, polycystic ovary syndrome, and beta-thalassemia major (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). However, IMA has not yet been evaluated in AA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In circumstances where OS increases, the extent of albumin structure modification also increases. Recently, IMA has been widely accepted as a marker of OS in many pathological conditions including AA (26)(27)(28). In their study, Dumlu et al (29) also observed increased IMA levels in the AG than in the CG.…”
Section: The Demographic Results Of Groupsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Eventually, complicated cases owing to late diagnosis (plastron or perforated appendicitis) and negative appendectomies continue to be encountered. In the literature, negative appendectomy rate was reportedly around 12.2%, and perforated appendicitis rate was 3.4% in adult patients (26,39). In a study conducted by Oyetunji et al (40) which involved 250.873 pediatric patients on whom appendectomy had been performed, it was demonstrated that negative appendectomy rate was 6.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%