Assessment of depression in medical patients: A systematic review of the utility of the Beck Depression Inventory-II

Wang, Yuan‐Pang; Gorenstein, Clarice

doi:10.6061/clinics/2013(09)15

Cited by 206 publications

(148 citation statements)

References 116 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

136

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, this study demonstrated that the reliability estimates of the HADS scales were comparable to those of the BAI and BDI-2 in other studies, and the HADS was more reliable than the HAM-D [8][9][10][11]. The HADS, however, contains one-third the items of the combined BAI and BDI-2.…”

Section: Boxley Et Al Hads In Mtbisupporting

confidence: 68%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a brief self-report measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. This study examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the HADS among Veterans in a polytrauma/traumatic brain injury clinic. The sample consisted of 312 Veterans. A confirmatory factor analysis of the depression and anxiety subscales showed, not surprisingly, that the two factors were highly correlated (r = 0.70). Goodness of fit statistics for the two-factor model were acceptable (root mean square error of approximation = 0.06, comparative fit index = 0.94). The HADS demonstrated very good reliability overall (alpha = 0.89) and for the individual subscales (alpha = 0.84). This study supports the use of the HADS as a screen for depression and anxiety in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury in a Veteran population.

show abstract

Section: Boxley Et Al Hads In Mtbisupporting

confidence: 68%

“…The BAI takes approximately 5 min to complete, and the BDI-2 takes approximately 5 to 10 min. Internal consistency of these measures is very good to excellent, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 [8][9][10]. The HAM-D is a 17-to 29-item clinicianadministered test that focuses on the cognitive and affective aspects of depression.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2007; Honarmand and Feinstein 2009; Quaranta et al. 2012; Wang and Gorenstein 2013). However, a few have assessed diagnostic accuracy against a structured clinical interview: Mohr et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostic accuracy for major depression in multiple sclerosis using self‐report questionnaires

Fischer

Nicholls

et al. 2015

Brain and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveMultiple sclerosis and major depressive disorder frequently co-occur but depression often remains undiagnosed in this population. Self-rated depression questionnaires are a good option where clinician-based standardized diagnostics are not feasible. However, there is a paucity of data on diagnostic accuracy of self-report measures for depression in multiple sclerosis (MS). Moreover, head-to-head comparisons of common questionnaires are largely lacking. This could be particularly relevant for high-risk patients with depressive symptoms. Here, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and 30-item version of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (IDS-SR30) for major depressive disorder (MSS) against diagnosis by a structured clinical interview.MethodsPatients reporting depressive symptoms completed the BDI, the IDS-SR30 and underwent diagnostic assessment (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, M.I.N.I.). Receiver-Operating Characteristic analyses were performed, providing error estimates and false-positive/negative rates of suggested thresholds.ResultsData from n = 31 MS patients were available. BDI and IDS-SR30 total score were significantly correlated (r = 0.82). The IDS-SR30total score, cognitive subscore, and BDI showed excellent to good accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) 0.86, 0.91, and 0.85, respectively).ConclusionBoth the IDS-SR30 and the BDI are useful to quantify depressive symptoms showing good sensitivity and specificity. The IDS-SR30 cognitive subscale may be useful as a screening tool and to quantify affective/cognitive depressive symptomatology.

show abstract

“…A total score is calculated by adding the scores of each item and ranges from 0 to 63. With high reliability and validity, the English version of BDI-II has been translated and popularized in various countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America (Alansari, 2005; Corbière, Bonneville-Roussy, Franche, et al, 2011; Gomes-Oliveira, Gorenstein, Lotufo Neto, et al, 2012; Penley, Wiebe, & Nwosu, 2003; Wang & Gorenstein, 2013). In the present study, the Chinese version of BDI-II demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.92.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey among people living with HIV/AIDS in China

Yang

Shiu

et al. 2015

Applied Nursing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese (Mandarin) version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS-CM) among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in Mainland China. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 200 Chinese PLWHA. They completed the MOS-SSS-CM along with the Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory Revised (BDI-II) scale, the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) scale. Results Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) was 0.97 for the overall MOS-SSS-CM and 0.82–0.91 for the five sub-scales originally proposed. However, 11 of the 19 items demonstrated unsatisfactory item discriminant validity. An exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution with tangible and social-emotional dimensions, which demonstrated satisfactory reliability and better discrimination between different subscales than did the original five-factor model. The concurrent validity of the two-factor scale was further confirmed by its significant negative correlations with the BDI-II (r = −0.41, p < 0.01); the SAS (r = −0.27, p < 0.01); and the PSS-10 (r = −0.30, p < 0.01), and significant positive correlation with the WHOQOL-BREF scale (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Conclusion We found a two-factor solution for the MOS-SSS-CM, which demonstrated good reliability and validity when applied to Chinese PLWHA. This was consistent with results from a study of Taiwanese caregivers. Further validation in other populations and disease states is warranted.

show abstract

Assessment of depression in medical patients: A systematic review of the utility of the Beck Depression Inventory-II

Cited by 206 publications

References 116 publications

Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic

Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic

Diagnostic accuracy for major depression in multiple sclerosis using self‐report questionnaires

Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey among people living with HIV/AIDS in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About