2016
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2015.05.0088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic

Abstract: Abstract-The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a brief self-report measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. This study examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the HADS among Veterans in a polytrauma/traumatic brain injury clinic. The sample consisted of 312 Veterans. A confirmatory factor analysis of the depression and anxiety subscales showed, not surprisingly, that the two factors were highly correlated (r = 0.70). Goodness of fit statistics for the two-factor model were ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HADS is a frequently used self-rating scale, comprised of subscales of anxiety and depression, developed to assess psychological distress in non-psychiatric patients. It is attractive to clinicians and researchers who need a rapid, efficient assessment [43] and has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients; in the general population as well as in different groups, including primary care patients, cognitively intact nursing home patients, and cancer inpatients [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Internal consistency was high in the present sample (Cronbach's α = 0.81).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The HADS is a frequently used self-rating scale, comprised of subscales of anxiety and depression, developed to assess psychological distress in non-psychiatric patients. It is attractive to clinicians and researchers who need a rapid, efficient assessment [43] and has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients; in the general population as well as in different groups, including primary care patients, cognitively intact nursing home patients, and cancer inpatients [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Internal consistency was high in the present sample (Cronbach's α = 0.81).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, it is difficult to distinguish anxiety from depression as they are commonly comorbid and have overlapping symptoms (69). Also, factor analyses showed that anxiety and depression subscales often yield highly correlated assessments (15, 56, 70) and that the correlation was indispensable even in a bifactor model (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HADS produces separate total scores for anxiety and depression (scores range from 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety or depression; scores of 5 (depression) and 7 (anxiety) or greater are considered the cut-offs for clinical screening (Singer et al, 2009). The validity (Bjelland et al, 2002) and reliability (Boxley et al, 2016) of this measure has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Anxiety and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%