2019
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20190151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Longitudinal Strain or Measurement of Ejection Fraction: Which Method is Better in Stratifying Patients with Heart Failure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a commonly used parameter for evaluating left ventricular systolic function, it has low sensitivity for assessing local myocardial damage [23], does not accurately reflect the left ventricular myocardial function [24,25], and cannot detect early myocardial dysfunction [26]. Myocardial strain has higher sensitivity and accuracy for evaluating cardiac function [27] and can assess the degree of myocardial deformation during the cardiac cycle [28], detect early changes in the left ventricular myocardium, and predict LVEF changes [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a commonly used parameter for evaluating left ventricular systolic function, it has low sensitivity for assessing local myocardial damage [23], does not accurately reflect the left ventricular myocardial function [24,25], and cannot detect early myocardial dysfunction [26]. Myocardial strain has higher sensitivity and accuracy for evaluating cardiac function [27] and can assess the degree of myocardial deformation during the cardiac cycle [28], detect early changes in the left ventricular myocardium, and predict LVEF changes [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is commonly used to evaluate left ventricular systolic function, it has various limitations. It has low sensitivity for local myocardial damage ( 13 ), does not accurately reflect left ventricular myocardium function ( 14 , 15 ), and cannot detect early myocardial dysfunction ( 16 ). Myocardial strain has greater sensitivity and accuracy for cardiac function and can assess the degree of myocardial deformation during the cardiac cycle, detect early left ventricular myocardial changes, and predict LVEF changes ( 17 19 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of DCM, particularly in the early stages of the disease, can often be difficult and rely on advanced echocardiography (speckle tracking analysis), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, comprehensive tissue characterization analysis, and genetic testing that often are not available or difficult to deliver to patients. Recent studies have reported that left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) [4] and heart rate variability (HRV), as supplementary features to the LVEF, can be used for better prediction of DCM [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GLS is a newly emerging topic which has a significant role in predicting cardiovascular outcomes [6]. GLS has shown greater effectiveness in identifying the overall deterioration of the left ventricle when compared to the LVEF measurement alone [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%