Duke Activity Status Index for Cardiovascular Diseases: Validation of the Portuguese Translation

Coutinho-Myrrha, Mariana A.; Dias, Rosângela Corrêa; Fernandes, Aline Andrioni; Araújo, Christiano Gonçalves de; Hlatky, Mark A.; Britto, Raquel Rodrigues

doi:10.5935/abc.20140031

Cited by 40 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…; Coutinho‐Myrrha et al . ). Long‐term reliability looking at patients in the pre‐dialysis stage and patients who have received a kidney transplant (n = 23) reported that test–retest reliability was in fact higher (0.81) for patients with lower eGFR scores of 15–34 ml/min/1.73 m 2 compared with patients with eGFR scores of 35–59 ml/min/1.73 m 2 whose respective ICC was 0.71 (Ravani et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Whilst the DASI questionnaire is often used in clinical practice and research for patients with CKD, to date there has only been one test-retest reliability study in this population (Ravani et al 2012;Coutinho-Myrrha et al 2014). Long-term reliability looking at patients in the pre-dialysis stage and patients who have received a kidney transplant (n = 23) reported that test-retest reliability was in fact higher (0.81) for patients with lower eGFR scores of 15-34 ml/min/1.73 m 2 compared with patients with eGFR scores of 35-59 ml/min/1.73 m 2 whose respective ICC was 0.71 (Ravani et al 2012).…”

Section: Test-retest Reliability For Physical Function Measures In Pamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Test–Retest Reliability for Physical Function Measures in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Hadjiioannou

Wong

Lindup

et al. 2019

Journal of Renal Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY Background It is important to determine relative and absolute reliability values in outcome measures that are used in clinical practice so as to discriminate between true changes following exercise interventions for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective The study aimed to assess test–retest reliability of the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), sit‐to‐stand transfers in 60 seconds (STS‐60), timed up and go (TUAG), Duke's activity status index (DASI) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD) in patients with CKD. Study Design This study was a pragmatic non‐randomised controlled trial. Methods Forty people attended two study visits within a 16‐day window involving the ISWT, STS‐60, TUAG, DASI and HAD tests. Relative reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and absolute reliability using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results Good test–retest reliability was found for the entire sample size across all outcome measures, with TUAG having the highest (ICC = 0.96) and HAD the lowest (ICC = 0.71). The MDC scores at 90% confidence interval (CI) were: 79.6 m for the ISWT, 2.9 seconds for the TUAG, 7.0 repetitions for the STS‐60, 8.4 for the DASI, 3.8 for the anxiety HAD subscale and 4.4 for the depression HAD subscale. Conclusions This study demonstrated good test–retest reliability for all outcome measures across the CKD trajectory but caution needs to be taken when interpreting the findings for each CKD sub‐group separately. The MDC scores at 90% CI can support therapists in determining a true improvement in CKD patients' physical or mental performance.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Test-retest Reliability For Physical Function Measures In Pamentioning

confidence: 99%

Test–Retest Reliability for Physical Function Measures in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Hadjiioannou

Wong

Lindup

et al. 2019

Journal of Renal Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A higher score represents better functional capacity. The instrument is validated in Portuguese [24].…”

Section: Measurement Of Secondary Outcomes Functionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and quality of life of patients with heart failure undergoing a functional training program: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Nascimento

Machado

Bock

et al. 2020

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Exercise intolerance is a common finding in heart failure that generates a vicious cycle in which the individual starts to limit his activities even more due to progressive fatigue. Regular physical exercise can increase the cardiopulmonary exercise capacity of these individuals. A new approach to physical exercise, known as functional training, could improve the oxygen consumption and quality of life of patients with heart failure; however, there is no information about the effect of this modality of exercise in this patient population. This randomized trial will compare the effects of 36 sessions of functional training versus strength training in heart failure patients. Methods: This randomized parallel-design examiner-blinded clinical trial includes individuals of both sexes aged ≥40 years receiving regular follow-up at a single academic hospital. Subjects will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (for 12-week functional training) or an active comparator group (for 12-week strength training). The primary outcomes will be the difference from baseline to the 3-month time point in peak oxygen consumption on cardiopulmonary exercise testing and quality of life assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures will include functionality assessed by the Duke Activity Status Index and gait speed test; peripheral and inspiratory muscular strength, assessed by hand grip and manovacuometry testing, respectively; endothelial function by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation; lean body mass by arm muscle circumference; and participant adherence to the exercise programs classified as a percentage of the prescribed exercise dose.

show abstract

“…("Você tem risco de ter diabetes tipo 2? "), da Sociedade Americana de Diabetes, adaptado (15) , que passou por processo de tradução e adaptação cultural, seguindo sugestões (16,17) para a validação e utilização do questionário proposto. A versão original do questionário (Figura 1) foi traduzida para o português de forma independente, gerando duas versões.…”

Section: Métodosunclassified

Avaliação do risco de desenvolver diabetes mellitus tipo 2 em população universitária

Magalhães¹,

Silva²,

Ribeiro³

et al. 2015

RBPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessment of risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in a university population Evaluación del riesgo de desarrollo de Diabetes Mellitus del tipo 2 en la población universitaria RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar a prevalência dos fatores de risco para desenvolver diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) em uma população universitária. Métodos: Estudo observacional, transversal, realizado entre 2013 e 2014 em uma universidade de Parnaíba-PI, com indivíduos maiores de 18 anos que estudam ou trabalham no campus. Do total populacional disposto no campus (4.310 pessoas), participaram da pesquisa 74% (111) dos docentes (G1), 77,68% (94) dos técnicos administrativos (G2) e 32,10% (1.299) dos discentes, totalizando 1.504 indivíduos que responderam ao questionário "Are you at risk for type 2 diabetes?", traduzido para a língua portuguesa, de forma impressa, individual e anônima, com as respostas obtidas através de autopreenchimento. Calculou-se o risco de desenvolver DM2 para cada grupo, a associação entre o grupo e o risco de DM2 com teste do Qui-Quadrado (p<0,05) e o risco relativo (RR) para desenvolvimento de DM2 considerando os escores obtidos no grupo. Resultados: A amostra contemplou 34,89% (1504) do n amostral. O risco de DM2 foi apresentado por 16,21% (18) dos indivíduos do G1, 13,82% (13) do G2 e 1,23% (16) do G3. Quanto à hipertensão, verificou-se a incidência de 17,1% (19) no G1, 12,8% (12) no G2 e 5,9% (77) no G3. Nos G1, G2 e G3, 59,5% (66), 38,3% (36) e 41,26% (536), respectivamente, não eram fisicamente ativos. O risco de desenvolver DM2 foi elevado no G1 e no G2, significativamente diferente do G3. Conclusão: Encontrou-se a prevalência do risco de desenvolver diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) de 16,21% no grupo de docentes, 13,82% no grupo de técnicos administrativos e 1,23% no grupo de discentes, destacando-se a obesidade e a inatividade física como fatores de risco mais comuns.

show abstract

Duke Activity Status Index for Cardiovascular Diseases: Validation of the Portuguese Translation

Cited by 40 publications

References 21 publications

Test–Retest Reliability for Physical Function Measures in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Test–Retest Reliability for Physical Function Measures in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and quality of life of patients with heart failure undergoing a functional training program: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Avaliação do risco de desenvolver diabetes mellitus tipo 2 em população universitária

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About