An auditory health program for neonates in ICU and/or intermediate care settings

Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca; Sartorato, Edi Lúcia; Tazinazzio, Tatiana Guilhermino; Françozo, Maria de Fátima de Campos; Couto, Christiane Marques do; Castilho, Arthur Menino; Rosa, Izilda Rodrigues Machado; Lima, Maria Cecília Marconi Pinheiro; Marba, Sérgio Tadeu Martins

doi:10.5935/1808-8694.20130130

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, there are consolidated data for newborn hearing screening (NHS). (6-11) Two of these studies analyzed the NHS results for newborns who remained in the ICU, (6,10) two related NHS results to prematurity (8,11) and others described NHS results and the profile of mothers and newborns in a maternity ward (9) or outlined the sociodemographic profile of mothers of newborns who underwent NHS in a university hospital. (7)…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heel prick test: maternal-fetal conditions that may have an effect on the test results in newborns admitted to the intensive care unit

Rodrigues

Tanaka

Haas

et al. 2019

Revista Brasileira De Terapia Intensiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To describe the characteristics of the heel prick test in newborns admitted to the intensive care unit of a university hospital as well as to determine whether maternal and fetal conditions could have affected the results of this test. Methods Retrospective longitudinal study with a quantitative approach that evaluated 240 medical records. The data collected were analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis. Results There was a predominance of pregnant women aged 20 to 34 years who had a complete secondary education and who had more than six prenatal care visits. Maternal complications or pathologies occurred in 60% of the mothers, and most (67.5%) did not present any condition that could have affected the heel prick test results. Most newborns were premature and exhibited low birth weight. Approximately 90% of newborns exhibited conditions that could have influenced the test, especially prematurity, parenteral nutrition and blood transfusion. Of the 240 newborns, 25% had abnormal heel prick test results, especially for cystic fibrosis and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Conclusion There are maternal and neonatal conditions that can affect heel prick test results, and therefore, their investigation is essential, aiming to guide measures that promote mother and child health and consolidate neonatal screening in this population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heel prick test: maternal-fetal conditions that may have an effect on the test results in newborns admitted to the intensive care unit

Rodrigues

Tanaka

Haas

et al. 2019

Revista Brasileira De Terapia Intensiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An auditory health program for neonates in ICU and/or intermediate care settings

Abstract: Neonatal auditory screening was not offered universally, and nor was it carried out, in many cases, within the child's first month of life. Screening must be performed before neonates are discharged and in more than one stage. A high incidence of hearing loss was observed.

Cited by 1 publication

References 22 publications

Heel prick test: maternal-fetal conditions that may have an effect on the test results in newborns admitted to the intensive care unit

Heel prick test: maternal-fetal conditions that may have an effect on the test results in newborns admitted to the intensive care unit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About