Agricultural tractor engines from the perspective of Agriculture 4.0

Schlosser, José Fernando; Farias, Marcelo Silveira de; Bertollo, Gilvan Moisés; Russini, Alexandre; Herzog, Daniela; Casali, Leonardo

doi:10.5935/1806-6690.20200094

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In animal care, modern sensors allow veterinarians to lead examinations on the farms with immediate tests and results ( Creedon et al., 2019 ). Intelligent sensors and systems enable the self-diagnosis of agricultural tractors in terms of gas and fuel, thus optimising performance, thermodynamic efficiency, and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions ( Hao et al., 2018 ; Schlosser et al., 2020 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric and thematic approach to agriculture 4.0

Mühl

Oliveira

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric and thematic approach to agriculture 4.0

Mühl

Oliveira

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Regulatory programs for agricultural machinery engines (Brazil/PROCONVE MAR1, Japan/Tier3, European Union/Stage5, Canada and South Korea/Tier4f) impose strict limits on pollutant emissions in their initial stages . Their guidelines foster improvement in the design of agricultural machine engines (SCHLOSSER et al, 2020) and the development of exhaust gas post-treatment technologies, improving atmospheric emission control (RESITOGLU et al, 2015;DALLMANN & SHAO, 2016). Because different engine power classes are responsible for different permissible emission levels, post-treatment Strategies for reducing engine pollutant emissions can be divided into primary and secondary methods.…”

Section: Pollutant Control Strategies and Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall, studies on potential technical solutions to reduce emissions from agricultural machinery engines have not been conducted extensively (SCHLOSSER et al, 2020). In addition, further research on legislation regulating off-road engine emissions (HOU et al, 2019; and analysis of diesel engine GHG emissions (RESITOGLU et al, 2015) are required.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fuel consumption by agricultural machinery: a review of pollutant emission control technologies

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most energy used to operate agricultural machines in the field is generated from fossil fuel combustion. The combustion process emits atmospheric pollutants, increasing the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). In this context, this review is to discuss technologies for mitigating diesel engine GHG emissions to advance sustainable development in the agricultural machinery sector. This paper presents strategies and technologies widely adopted by agricultural machinery manufacturers in controlling pollutant emissions during fuel combustion. The findings of this study encompass sustainable alternative technologies, such as selective catalytic reduction, exhaust gas recirculation, diesel particulate filter, and fuels. This study helps reveal the environmental impact of agricultural field operations that generate GHG emissions.

show abstract

“…Internal combustion engines are widely used in agriculture and most are compression-ignition endothermic engines (diesel cycle), which are currently assembled with an electronic fuel injection system (Schlosser et al, 2020), allowing more precise adjustment of the injection time and pressure (Kumar et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of a diesel engine using different biodiesel blends and injection configurations

Sala

Schlosser

Bertollo

et al. 2023

Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diesel cycle engines are widely used in a wide range of agricultural activities. Recently, with the increasing use of biodiesel mixed with petroleum diesel and the introduction of pollutant emission regulations for agricultural and road machinery, there has been a growing migration from mechanical to electronic fuel injection systems. In this experiment, the primary aim was to verify the behavior of a diesel engine, electronically managed, with controlled variation of the fuel feeding system parameters (injection time and volume injected). A four-cylinder agricultural tractor with a turbocharged engine and a common rail electronic fuel injection system was used. Tests with diesel B10 and blends of 20 and 30% biodiesel were carried out, all with 10 ppm of sulfur and the injection system electronically reprogrammed. The tests were performed under full engine load from 1,300 to 2,000 rpm. The torque, power and fuel consumption were evaluated. Advancing the injection point increased the power and decreased the specific fuel consumption for all fuels. The greater amount of injected fuel provided average power gain of up to 14.96% and average torque gain of 15.50%.

show abstract

Agricultural tractor engines from the perspective of Agriculture 4.0

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

A bibliometric and thematic approach to agriculture 4.0

A bibliometric and thematic approach to agriculture 4.0

Fuel consumption by agricultural machinery: a review of pollutant emission control technologies

Performance of a diesel engine using different biodiesel blends and injection configurations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About