2017
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20170102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield adaptability and stability of semi-erect cowpea genotypes in the Northeast region of Brazil by REML/BLUP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genotype with b = 1.0 was considered as adapted to al environments, genotype with b < 1.0 was considered adapted for low yielding environments and genotype with b > 1.0 was considered as better adapted for high yielding environments, depending upon the genotype mean yield. De Rocha et al (2007a) found that TE97-321G-4, EVX-92-49E and EVX-63-10E cowpea lines were highly adaptable, but only the last one was highly predictable. The BRS Guariba cultivar as well as EVX-92-49E and TE97-321G-4 lines best expressed their genetic potential in environments of high yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotype with b = 1.0 was considered as adapted to al environments, genotype with b < 1.0 was considered adapted for low yielding environments and genotype with b > 1.0 was considered as better adapted for high yielding environments, depending upon the genotype mean yield. De Rocha et al (2007a) found that TE97-321G-4, EVX-92-49E and EVX-63-10E cowpea lines were highly adaptable, but only the last one was highly predictable. The BRS Guariba cultivar as well as EVX-92-49E and TE97-321G-4 lines best expressed their genetic potential in environments of high yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KSC706, KSC703, and KSC707 genotypes are the most unstable, low-yielding genotypes, and the DC370 genotype, the most stable, high-yielding genotype. Environmental stability is essential for demonstrating the reliability of genotype ordering in a given environment about the rating for the environments in question [ 32 ]. According to the AMMI2 graph, 68.1% of the data variance explained 46.4% of the first component and 21.7% to the second component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the yield of plants is influenced by the environment (E) more than the genotype–environment interaction (GEI) and genotype (G). Different peanut lines therefore show the highest yield potential at different locations ( Tai and Hammons, 1978 ; Oliveira and Godoy, 2006 ; Kasno and Trustinah, 2015 ; De Moura et al, 2017 ). Testing plant varieties in different testing environments, where the responses would reflect the adaptability of the peanut genotypes to the inherent and persistent natural environmental factors of the different peanut production areas, provides valuable information for cultivar selection and final release ( Banterng et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%