2015
DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of pulmonary reperfusion injury in rats subjected to mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion and protective effect of postconditioning on this process

Abstract: INTRODUCTION Some publications have demonstrated the presence of lung reperfusion injury in mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion (I/R), but under to diverse methods. Postconditioning has been recognized as effective in preventing reperfusion injury in various organs and tissues. However, its effectiveness has not been evaluated in the prevention of lung reperfusion injury after mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the presence of pulmonary reperfusion injury and the protective effect of isc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be true when comparing these two studies evaluating IPC pulmonary action, since there was a difference in the method and this has been the greatest difficulty when comparing the numerous studies of IPC - the wide variation in the method used. The second question refers to the origin of ischemia: Dorsa et al [15] performed aortic clamping while Santos et al [16] and the present study used mesenteric ischemia. This factor may have some influence since in the aortic clamping, the harmful products of the I/R would spread to all the organs and tissues, whereas in the intestinal I/R, all blood is primarily drained to the liver, thus leading to increased toxic concentration of reactive oxygen species on this organ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would be true when comparing these two studies evaluating IPC pulmonary action, since there was a difference in the method and this has been the greatest difficulty when comparing the numerous studies of IPC - the wide variation in the method used. The second question refers to the origin of ischemia: Dorsa et al [15] performed aortic clamping while Santos et al [16] and the present study used mesenteric ischemia. This factor may have some influence since in the aortic clamping, the harmful products of the I/R would spread to all the organs and tissues, whereas in the intestinal I/R, all blood is primarily drained to the liver, thus leading to increased toxic concentration of reactive oxygen species on this organ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there is still a lot of controversy in the literature on the outcome of remote protection of IPC. Recently, Santos et al [16] also evaluated the possible protective action of IPC on lung parenchyma when performing mesenteric I/R in rats and found no benefits in using this technique. Similarly, the research presented here showed no liver protection with IPC on mesenteric I/R, leaving some possibilities to be considered, still with no clear answers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Szijártó et al [ 13 ] also demonstrated IPC protection when IPC was performed on the lower limbs of rats, with three hours of ischemia and four hours of reperfusion. Santos et al [ 6 ] also performed mesenteric IR in rats, but used 30 minutes of ischemia and 60 minutes of reperfusion, causing intestinal lesions but not pulmonary lesions, thus demonstrating that these animals did not present significant damage to the lungs with these reduced periods of intestinal IR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques for protection against reperfusion injury have already been tried and tested, and among them, ischemic postconditioning (IPC), which consists of one or more short cycles of reperfusion, followed by one or more short cycles of ischemia, immediately after the ischemic phase and before permanent reperfusion occurs. Although IPC has already shown a protective effect in many organs submitted to IR as well as in distance protection [ 6 ] , its efficacy in the prevention of remote lung injury is still very early [ 7 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(23) It also increases the expression of other cytokines such as interlukin-6 as well TNF-α. (23,24) Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is a potentially curative procedure in chronically thromboembolic pulmonary artery hypertension. The early mortality rate in 54 patients between 1989 and 1992 was 22.2% (12/54) and currently below 7%.…”
Section: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%