2013
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20130057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Extraction Methods for Kahweol and Cafestol Analysis in Roasted Coffee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation has already been cited in literature (1:1 [26,27,35]; 1:2 [22,23,26] and 2:1 cafestol:kahweol [41]). …”
Section: Evaluation Of Kaurane Diterpenes In Methanolysed Green Aramentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variation has already been cited in literature (1:1 [26,27,35]; 1:2 [22,23,26] and 2:1 cafestol:kahweol [41]). …”
Section: Evaluation Of Kaurane Diterpenes In Methanolysed Green Aramentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The utilization of a short extraction time can result in incomplete leaching of the analytes from the matrix surface [21]. However, prolonged exposure to hot conditions may result in the formation of artifacts due to their thermolability [16,18,[22][23][24]. Similarly, alkaline hydrolysis employs strong bases, for example NaOH and KOH that can ϱ be very aggressive for labile compounds such as the furokaurane diterpenes of coffee [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Microwave interacts with matter in a special way that causes instantaneous heating, thus facilitating desorption of analytes from their matrices and improving mass transfer rate [111, 112]. Compared to conventional solvent extraction, MAE is faster and involves minimal use of solvent.…”
Section: Extraction Methods For Bioactive Micronutrients Of Coffeementioning
confidence: 99%