2014
DOI: 10.5935/0034-7280.20140003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical outcomes between limbal relaxing incisions and toric intraocular lenses in eyes with astigmatic corneas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arcuate keratotomies or corneal relaxing incisions have limited predictability and often result in overcorrection, especially in eyes with low and moderate astigmatism. Currently, limbal relaxing incisions are the preferred technique to reduce preexisting astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery [ 11 , 14 16 ]. Limbal relaxing incisions appear to have potential advantages over corneal relaxing incisions or arcuate keratotomy by causing less distortion and irregularity on corneal topographies and less variability in refraction because they are placed at the limbus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arcuate keratotomies or corneal relaxing incisions have limited predictability and often result in overcorrection, especially in eyes with low and moderate astigmatism. Currently, limbal relaxing incisions are the preferred technique to reduce preexisting astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery [ 11 , 14 16 ]. Limbal relaxing incisions appear to have potential advantages over corneal relaxing incisions or arcuate keratotomy by causing less distortion and irregularity on corneal topographies and less variability in refraction because they are placed at the limbus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, correction index (CI) was calculated to evaluate the achieved power effect versus the targeted power, CI = |SIA|/|TIA| [ 10 ]. The ideal value would be close to 1; CI >1.0 D indicated overcorrection, while CI <1.0 D indicated undercorrection [ 11 ]. Calculations of Thibos vectors for refractive and corneal astigmatism were performed using Microsoft ExcelTM for MacIntosh spreadsheets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%