2019
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20190092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual loss following cosmetic facial filler injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to injection sites and materials, our results are consistent with the past literature. The most common injection site resulting in visual impairment was the forehead, followed by the nasal region and the glabella, which is the same finding as that in a previous report [1,5,[9][10][11]. The most common filler material was HA and, second, autologous fat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to injection sites and materials, our results are consistent with the past literature. The most common injection site resulting in visual impairment was the forehead, followed by the nasal region and the glabella, which is the same finding as that in a previous report [1,5,[9][10][11]. The most common filler material was HA and, second, autologous fat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Sites that are at high risk for complications include the glabella, nasal region and forehead [9][10][11]. Patients experiencing severe ocular complications following cosmetic filler injection can be classified into four types according to their periocular manifestations, including ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and enophthalmos [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study found that cosmetic procedures ended up with post-procedure adverse events in 19%, and non-satisfactions in 18% of patients. We could not compare such finding with local data, as there is almost lack of data about adverse events associated with cosmetic procedures in Saudi Arabia (21). Internationally, the rate of adverse events ranged between <1% in minimally invasive cosmetic procedures(13) (as in the majority of procedures studied in the current study) and 84% in traditional plastic surgeries (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A oclusão de vasos distais pode promover o escurecimento cutâneo, formação de ulcerações e escaras (Trindade de Almeida & Araújo Sampaio, 2015). A embolização iatrogênica da artéria oftálmica, pela administração de ácido hialurônico, ocasionando cegueira é uma complicação rara, e o reconhecimento precoce e tratamento desse tipo de complicação pode ser crucial para o desfecho do caso (Chatrath, et al, 2019;Shoughy, 2019). Além disso, a oclusão acidental de artérias acontece mais em consequência dos tratamentos realizados no nariz, podendo ser ocasionada ainda por procedimentos realizados na glabela (Kim, et al, 2015;Sito, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified