2001
DOI: 10.5902/19805098500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulação e avaliação econômica de regimes de desbastes e desrama para obter madeira de Pinus taeda livre de nós.

Abstract: RESUMOEste estudo teve como objetivo simular e avaliar economicamente regimes de desbastes e de desrama para Pinus taeda, para obtenção de madeira livre de nós (clearwood) e de madeira para múltiplos usos. A área em estudo está situada no município de Jaguariaíva -PR. Foram testados dois cenários com diferentes números, épocas e intensidade de desbaste, com base em diferentes densidades iniciais de plantio, em diferentes níveis de produtividade, almejando a produção de madeira desramada, livre de nós, e de mad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
2
4
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This optimum density obtained for most simulated scenarios differs from that recommended by Scolforo et al (2001) and Acerbi Jr et al (2002), in simulations of management regimes of Pinus taeda.…”
Section: Revenue Optimization and Sensitivity Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This optimum density obtained for most simulated scenarios differs from that recommended by Scolforo et al (2001) and Acerbi Jr et al (2002), in simulations of management regimes of Pinus taeda.…”
Section: Revenue Optimization and Sensitivity Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…This shows that the lack of thinnings in more productive sites considerably reduces ANPV with the advancement of the stand age, which was also reported by Scolforo et al (2001) in simulations of management regimes of Pinus taeda in the state of Paraná.…”
Section: Economic Analysis and Behavior Of Regimessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations