2014
DOI: 10.5902/1980509813321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito do intervalo de imersão e de injeção de ar na multiplicação <i>in vitro</i> de <i>Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla</i> em biorreator de imersão temporária

Abstract: RESUMOOs objetivos do presente estudo foram avaliar diferentes intervalos de imersão (2, 4, 8 e 16 horas) e suportes de apoio (papel-filtro e espuma) dos explantes de Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla dentro dos recipientes de imersão temporária automatizada (RITA ® ), assim como um sistema de ventilação com entrada de ar acoplado ao recipiente dos biorreatores. Foram avaliadas as características: massa fresca, número de brotos e hiper-hidricidade dos explantes, na fase de multiplicação de gemas axilar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the use of the nutrients of the MS medium was significantly favorable for the root development of 'Pircinque' strawberry roots, but more prominently when it was kept in contact with the explants five times per day. These data do not corroborate the results of Oliveira et al (2014), who concluded that in the majority of cases, the smaller intervals between the immersions favored the development of the cultures by the greater use of the liquid culture medium by the plant. Figure 3A shows explant and shoot growth (cm), where explant length was higher under immersion conditions of 5x/day in liquid MS culture medium.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, the use of the nutrients of the MS medium was significantly favorable for the root development of 'Pircinque' strawberry roots, but more prominently when it was kept in contact with the explants five times per day. These data do not corroborate the results of Oliveira et al (2014), who concluded that in the majority of cases, the smaller intervals between the immersions favored the development of the cultures by the greater use of the liquid culture medium by the plant. Figure 3A shows explant and shoot growth (cm), where explant length was higher under immersion conditions of 5x/day in liquid MS culture medium.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…It is verified that for both the average number of leaves and roots, the bioreactor system of temporary immersion of liquid culture medium favored the development of 'Pircinque' strawberry explants. According to Oliveira et al (2014), this result confirms that root proliferation depends on the availability of water and nutrients in the surrounding microenvironment. In this sense, if this microenvironment is low in nutrients or very dry, root growth is slow, and, as conditions improve, root growth tends to increase (TAIZ and ZEIGER, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A higher number of shoots per explant was observed at higher sucrose concentrations, ranging from 18.3 to 23.9 (table 3). These results surpass those observed by Oliveira et al (2011), who obtained approximately 10 shoots per explant after 28 days of cultivating Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. x E. urophylla S. T. Blake clones in semi-solid Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 30 g L -1 of sucrose, which is half of what we found (20.0) (table 3).…”
Section: Treatmentscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…For example, the use of bioreactors containing liquid media facilitates the rapid uptake of nutrients through submersion in the nutrient-rich medium and may serve as an alternative for cultivating Eucalyptus spp. clones (Oliveira et al 2011).…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific innovations have been proposed for the application of large-scale micropropagation technologies in Eucalyptus (Xavier et al, 2013), such as the manipulation of the in vitro atmosphere and/or environment (e.g., photoautotrophic propagation) (Kozai, 2010); the use of temporary immersion and liquid medium bioreactors (Oliveira et al, 2011(Oliveira et al, , 2014; the replacement of the semisolid medium with alternative substrates (Kirdmanee, et al, 1995); the automation and mechanization of systems operations (Penchel et al, 2007); and the use of in vitro microclonal hedge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%