The battle of narratives between the powers: party hyperfragmentation, judicialization of politics and supremocracy in the Brazilian political-institutional system

Brígida, Yasmim Salgado Santa; Verbicaro, Loiane Prado

doi:10.5380/rinc.v7i1.69637

RINC

2020

DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v7i1.69637

|View full text |Cite

The battle of narratives between the powers: party hyperfragmentation, judicialization of politics and supremocracy in the Brazilian political-institutional system

Yasmim Salgado Santa Brígida

Loiane Prado Verbicaro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the loss of power from legislatures to courts, see: HACHEM; PETHECHUST, 2021; BRÍGIDA;VERBICARO, 2020; PETHECHUST, 2020. 8 Fortman(2011) maintains that the numerical criterion is often not adequate for the division between majority and minority, given that it neglects one of the standards of the problem related to minorities, consisting in the abuse of dominant positions, often derived from the exercise of power economic, which can place, as history has shown, numerical minorities in a dominant position.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Human rights in procedural democracies: a contribution to the debate

Júnior

Salgado

2021

Rev. Direito Econ. Socioambiental

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Se os direitos humanos encontram ambiente de desenvolvimento inseguro nos regimes cujas escolhas públicas são orientadas pelas regras de mercado, também encontram ambiente frágil na democracia liberal. A democracia liberal -descritiva, procedimental e até certo ponto minimalista, preocupada prioritariamente em assegurar formalmente as liberdades individuais clássicas -enfrenta na atualidade aguda crise, com suas históricas conquistas sendo ameaçadas por ideias populistas e antidemocráticas. O presente artigo, dialogando com os estudos sobre democracia e liberalismo, analisa a relação entre a democracia liberal e os direitos humanos, para, ao final, apontar a necessidade de que a democracia, para a sua própria sobrevivência, alargue seus horizontes rumo à promoção dos direitos humanos para além das liberdades clássicas, visando à construção de uma sociedade materialmente igualitária.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Human rights in procedural democracies: a contribution to the debate

Júnior

Salgado

2021

Rev. Direito Econ. Socioambiental

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Courts as Organizations: Governance and Legitimacy

Guimarães

Guarido

Luz

2020

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interdependence between governance and legitimacy of the courts is a subject that has not been much studied by scholars, especially those from the fields of public administration and organizational studies. Taking into account the importance of these topics for the functioning of these organizations, the purpose of this essay is twofold: to enrich the debate on the contribution of good governance to the legitimacy of courts, and to encourage researchers to address these themes in greater depth. To this end, the main literature on governance and legitimacy of courts is analyzed. Theoretical approaches contribute to the discussion of the functioning of courts, which are highly institutionalized organizations that depend heavily on a presumption of legitimacy. Ensuring this legitimacy has been one of the challenges for these organizations, which are required to adopt governance models that contribute to better management and performance. We argue that there are managerial and substantive implications for society, since the governance and legitimacy of courts can affect the system of justice. We put forward some propositions on the influence of judicial governance on the legitimacy of the justice system and on the perception of legitimacy of the courts. These propositions provide insights for a research agenda on these issues.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The battle of narratives between the powers: party hyperfragmentation, judicialization of politics and supremocracy in the Brazilian political-institutional system

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Human rights in procedural democracies: a contribution to the debate

Human rights in procedural democracies: a contribution to the debate

Courts as Organizations: Governance and Legitimacy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About