2010
DOI: 10.5028/jatm.2010.0201105110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons between aerovane and sonic anemometer wind measurements at Alcântara Launch Center

Abstract: This paper aimed to compare the wind measurements in two different types of anemometer: classical aerovane and modern sonic anemometer. The two sensors were installed at Alcântara Launch Center during a dry period of 2008 at 10 m height. The analysis compared the average and maximum wind speed for one-and ten-minute time intervals for each anemometer. The results showed that, considering the range of the measurements (from 3.0 up to 6.5 m/s), the average and maximum wind speed are different by roughly 0.5 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reference Reynolds number (Re) was 2.5 × 10 7 , with a characteristic length corresponding to the TMI height (33 m). The incident velocity direction was 70° (North-Northeast, NNE, mean wind direction obtained by reanalyzed data), which agrees with the prevailing winds of the ALC: northeast and east winds (Fisch 2010;Medeiros et al 2013). Some tests were carried out and the inlet turbulence intensity obtained for the convergence and validation of the simulation was determined by 5% (κ and ε were 0.17 m 2 •s -2 and 2.80 10 -4 m 2 •s -2 , respectively), the same value obtained for the wind tunnel measurements (Faria et al 2019) and close to observational values obtained by Fisch (1999).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The reference Reynolds number (Re) was 2.5 × 10 7 , with a characteristic length corresponding to the TMI height (33 m). The incident velocity direction was 70° (North-Northeast, NNE, mean wind direction obtained by reanalyzed data), which agrees with the prevailing winds of the ALC: northeast and east winds (Fisch 2010;Medeiros et al 2013). Some tests were carried out and the inlet turbulence intensity obtained for the convergence and validation of the simulation was determined by 5% (κ and ε were 0.17 m 2 •s -2 and 2.80 10 -4 m 2 •s -2 , respectively), the same value obtained for the wind tunnel measurements (Faria et al 2019) and close to observational values obtained by Fisch (1999).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Fisch (2010) documented potential differences in wind speed between the sensor types used in these two cruises, finding that the ultrasonic anemometer measurements can be 0.3 m s −1 faster than the aerovane for average speed and 1.0 m s −1 faster at maximum speeds [40] . We sampled a range of wind speeds within the average wind speeds experienced in the Fisch study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%