2018
DOI: 10.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n1p82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling and predicting performance of indoor rock climbers

Abstract: The aim of this study is to establish somatotype and profile the anthropometric and biomotor characteristics of indoor rock climbers. Fourteen elite level male and ten recreational female Iranian indoor rock climbers completed a battery of tests. All anthropometric measurements were performed according to the recommendations of international standards for anthropometric assessment. Upper body strength and endurance were assessed by isometric tests. Explosive power and balance were also evaluated by Sargent jum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our forearm measurements, however, were comparable for the untrained cohort (28.3 cm vs. 26.02 cm, while we measured 26.9 cm vs. 26.17 cm). Nonetheless, the differences 10 cm below lateral epicondyle that we detected, can be similarly seen in the study by Tomaszewski et al, indicating that specific body compositions such as forearm volume favor climbing performance [ 13 ], which is additionally confirmed in a study by Arazi et al [ 4 ]. The group of Ozimek et al measured twenty climbing athletes with an IRCRA-level of 25–27 and 22–23, therein comparing elite and advanced climbers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our forearm measurements, however, were comparable for the untrained cohort (28.3 cm vs. 26.02 cm, while we measured 26.9 cm vs. 26.17 cm). Nonetheless, the differences 10 cm below lateral epicondyle that we detected, can be similarly seen in the study by Tomaszewski et al, indicating that specific body compositions such as forearm volume favor climbing performance [ 13 ], which is additionally confirmed in a study by Arazi et al [ 4 ]. The group of Ozimek et al measured twenty climbing athletes with an IRCRA-level of 25–27 and 22–23, therein comparing elite and advanced climbers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All of these reached forces were higher compared to our findings. One reason could be that Azari et al used a digital hand dynamometer (Saehan) and pincer dynamometer (Pinch Gauge) to measure grip strength, and the highest values were recorded [ 4 ]. On the other side, we measured the mean of two samples each.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ñïîðòñìåíû òàêaeå îòëè÷àþòñÿ íàáîðîì áîëåå ìàñêóëèííûõ ÷åðò è ïðåäñòàâëÿþò ñîáîé îäèí èç àäàïòèâíûõ ìîðôî-ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèõ òèïîâ, ñâÿçàííûõ ñ óðîâíåì òåñòîñòåðîíà ó ìóae÷èí [Áóòîâñêàÿ ñ ñîàâò., 2010;Áóòîâñêàÿ, Áóaeèëîâà, 2016;Arazi et al, 2018]. Ê òàêèì ÷åðòàì íåîáõîäèìî äîáàâëÿòü è íèçêèé ïàëüöåâîé èíäåêñ, êîòîðûé çàôèêñèðîâàí âî ìíîãèõ èññëåäîâàíèÿõ ñðåäè ñïîðòñìåíîâ [Áóòîâñêàÿ ñ ñîàâò., 2017;Ribeiro et al, 2016;Gallup, Fink, 2018].…”
Section: пальцевой индекс и профессиональная ориентацияunclassified
“…Òàê, â îòäåëüíûé àäàïòèâíûé òèï ìîãóò áûòü âûäåëåíû ñïîðòñìåíû. Îòëè÷èòåëüíîå ÷åðòîé ýòîãî òèïà ÿâëÿåòñÿ áËëüøàÿ ìàñêóëèííîñòü ÷åðò (ïðè ñðàâíåíèè ñ êîíòðîëåì) [Áóòîâñêàÿ ñ ñîàâò., 2010;Áóòîâñêàÿ, Áóaeèëîâà, 2016;Áóòîâñêàÿ ñ ñîàâò., 2017;Manning, Tailor, 2001;Arazi et al, 2018]. Âûðàaeåííîñòü ÷åðò ìàñêóëèííîãî êîìïëåêñà (ñèëà, ñìåëîñòü, õîðîøàÿ ïðîñòðàíñòâåííàÿ îðèåíòàöèÿ è ò.ï.)…”
Section: Introductionunclassified