2015
DOI: 10.5007/1980-0037.2015v17n6p713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação entre equações preditivas do gasto calórico de gestantes em repouso e exercício

Abstract: -The regular changes that occur during pregnancy increase energy expenditure at rest and during exercise. Prediction models are practical tools that facilitate the estimation of energy expenditure. The objective of this study was to analyze the reliability of prediction models of energy expenditure for pregnant women in two situations, at rest and during light-intensity exercise, compared to indirect calorimetry. Energy expenditure was measured in 10 pregnant women during the second trimester of gestation (23.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, techniques focusing on BM parameters to estimate EE would hide possible adaptations on metabolism dependent on the physiological state. In fact, predictive equations should be used with caution, since they could cause a major distortion in the estimation of EE (Fernandes & Takito, 2015). Interestingly, other studies comparing pregnant and nonpregnant females using a different methodology did not find significant increases on TEE (Heini et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, techniques focusing on BM parameters to estimate EE would hide possible adaptations on metabolism dependent on the physiological state. In fact, predictive equations should be used with caution, since they could cause a major distortion in the estimation of EE (Fernandes & Takito, 2015). Interestingly, other studies comparing pregnant and nonpregnant females using a different methodology did not find significant increases on TEE (Heini et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%