Types of Criminal Governance: A Comparative Study Based on the Cases of Maré

Ribeiro, Eduardo Pontual; Soares, Luiz Eduardo; Krenzinger, Miriam

doi:10.4322/dilemas.v15esp4.52530

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This last point also makes explicit dynamics according to which are relativized more general ontological frameworks -such as the ver y humanity of agents (Freire & Teixeira, 2016) or the borderline character of young people as privileged characters involved in crime (Gonçalves, 2020); and specific points of public debate -such as the statute of torture (Jesus & Gomes, 2021), the value of life (Beraldo, 2021) or "criminal governances" (Muniz & Nunes, 2022;Ribeiro et al, 2022;Briceño-León et al, 2022).…”

Section: Final Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Imperative of Opinion: A Pragmatic Sociology of Critique in ‘Actualité Politique’

Werneck,

Talone,

Gualande Junior

2023

Sociol. Antropol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the concept of actualité politique, this essay aims to analyze the economy of opinion and critique in contemporary societies. Based on various research projects arising from our works and on a reflection concerning the pragmatic sociology of critique, we respond to a fundamental question: what are the determinants of the ‘passage’ of a critique into action; i.e., the conversion of internal indignation into an external manifestation of the social actors? The argument has three parts, one structural and two conjectural. In the first, we map the main variables determining the passage from indignation to criticism. In the second, we show how a series of historical transformations in the scarcity/abundance interplay of the elements in this matrix have made opinion and criticism more available and, in the continued evolution of their presence in contemporary life, a core mode of sociability. In the third part, we analyze three consequences of this movement: the trivialization of criticism, conflict, and the devaluation of objective truth.

show abstract