Validity and Reliability of the Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting System (Pegs) for Brazilian Children

Abstract

Introduction: The engagement in client-centered practice requires instrumentation that allows the participation of the child and family in the definition of treatment goals. Objective: The aim of the present study was to pilot a translated version of the Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting System (PEGS) and determine its validity and reliability for clinical use with Brazilian children. Method: Eighty children six to nine years old (40 public school children and 40 private school children), as well as their caregivers and teachers, completed the PEGS. Results: The children understood the pictures and interview procedures. Caregivers and teachers reported no difficulties in understanding the questionnaires. Gender, age, and type of school had no significant influence over the children's scores. Cultural influence on the response to two items was identified but could be resolved with extra explanation. Stability of the goals was supported and the children, caregivers, and teachers appear to share views regarding the overall abilities of the children. Conclusion: The PEGS has potential for clinical use with Brazilian children, but clinicians should be aware that some items require further instructions. The usefulness of the PEGS as a tool to promote client-centered practice among Brazilian occupational therapists should be investigated.

Instrumentos de avaliação da terapia ocupacional para crianças e adolescentes no Brasil: uma revisão da literatura

“…A respeito das qualidades psicométricas, verificou-se que quase todos os instrumentos de avaliação encontrados no presente estudo apresentaram boas evidências de adequação psicométrica no contexto brasileiro, ainda que alguns tenham indicado a necessidade de futuras análises para maior aprofundamento visando assegurar sua reprodutibilidade (Cordeiro, 2005;Chaves, 2012;Faria & Magalhães, 2006;Paicheco et al, 2010;Pfeifer et al, 2011a;Mattos et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2017;Ruggio et al, 2018;Sarraff et al, 2018;Demarchi et al, 2019;Sposito et al, 2019;Alves et al, 2019;Galvão, 2019). Apenas em relação aos Protocolos do Modelo Lúdico (Sant'Anna et al, 2008) e o CHEQ (Brandão et al, 2016) não foram encontrados estudos dos processos de validação no Brasil.…”

Efficacy of CO-OP Approach With and Without Parental Coaching: RCT Study Protocol: Efficacité de l’approche CO-OP avec et sans coaching parental : protocole d’essai clinique randomisé

“…Children and parents will be asked to talk about their daily activities and to choose three goals to achieve during the intervention and one extra goal (transfer goal) as the outcome measure for transfer (Capistran & Martini, 2016). Children will choose their goals with the perceived efficacy and goal setting system (PEGS) (Missiuna et al, 2004;Ruggio et al, 2018), which helps children to evaluate self-efficacy and choose therapy goals. PEGS is a structured interview with 24 paired cards with drawings of children doing poor or good performance on typical childhood activities.…”

A Collaborative and Cognitive-based Intervention for Young People with Cerebral Palsy

“…PEGS was used because the participants had little experience setting goals and picture cards could facilitate the expression of their needs. PEGS has been transculturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese with evidence of validity (Ruggio et al, 2018).…”