2013
DOI: 10.4301/s1807-17752013000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using university ranking systems to predict usability of University websites

Abstract: This research investigated whether a university ranking system called Eduroute could provide useful information regarding the usability of universities' websites. A comparison was conducted between the results obtained by Eduroute regarding the ranking of the top three universities in Jordan, and the results obtained by the heuristic evaluation method regarding the usability of the top three universities' websites. Before employing the heuristic evaluation method, two steps were taken: Investigating the most f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the study of [71] examines only a limited set of sites shows that highly ranked universities on webometric sites have the lowest number of usability problems per investigated pages. The present study reinforces the notion that sites of institutions that rank high tend to display better metrics in aspects such as accessibility and usability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the study of [71] examines only a limited set of sites shows that highly ranked universities on webometric sites have the lowest number of usability problems per investigated pages. The present study reinforces the notion that sites of institutions that rank high tend to display better metrics in aspects such as accessibility and usability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works by Hasan [71], Kaur et al [72], and Nagpal et al [73] examine online presence and content for academic institutions. In [71] the author successfully lists various criteria that are used by university ranking systems. It is noticeable that ranking systems who try to use an institution's web presence as a metric mainly focus on the volume of that presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pinto et al (2009, p. 274) used a rubric with 70 indicators, 3 of which related to navigability. Similarly, Hasan (2013) had dichotomous indicators based on five navigation‐specific problem areas: weak navigation support, misleading links, broken links, orphan pages, and ineffective internal search. The rubrics' constructs tend to be more concerned with a website's technical efficacy than the logical consequences of language embedded in its pages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palmer (2002) suggested that what user wants in the website is the most important area as the website is the primary user interface for any organization. Hasan (2013) has used heuristic evaluation for assessing the usability of universities in Jordan where it was found that user interface design was the most concerning element. Hasan and Abuelrub (2008) have argued that user interface should be attractive, enjoyable and pleasant enough to create emotional appeal among users.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%