2012
DOI: 10.4136/ambi-agua.849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate and dissolved sulfide variation under low COD/Sulfate ratio in Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) treating domestic wastewater

Abstract: In this study, the dynamics of sulfate reduction and dissolved sulfide generation (S2-, HS-, H2Saq) in liquid phase was evaluated in an UASB reactor treating domestic wastewater with low COD/Sulfate content. The evaluation in the UASB reactor was performed at three sludge heights (0.25, 1.25, 2.25 taps) and effluent of the reactor. Sulfate reduction was verified in the reactor, with an average reduction of 24 % throughout the experiment period. However, the dissolved sulfide concentration in the reactor was no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve high organic matter rejection, forward osmosis (FO) has been used in DMF applications. However, the draw solution regeneration [32], low concentration factor, and sulfate retention in the concentrate which cause serious problems for anaerobic digestion (i.e., toxicity, odor, and reduced methane production) are significant drawbacks [6,33,34]. On the other hand, increased amounts of GO in the membrane separating layer can improve separation capability of porous membrane by enhancing the exclusion mechanism, while reducing the effect of fouling-induced flow loss [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve high organic matter rejection, forward osmosis (FO) has been used in DMF applications. However, the draw solution regeneration [32], low concentration factor, and sulfate retention in the concentrate which cause serious problems for anaerobic digestion (i.e., toxicity, odor, and reduced methane production) are significant drawbacks [6,33,34]. On the other hand, increased amounts of GO in the membrane separating layer can improve separation capability of porous membrane by enhancing the exclusion mechanism, while reducing the effect of fouling-induced flow loss [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%