2019
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual selection of Urochloa ruziziensis genotypes for green biomass yield

Abstract: The breeding program of Urochloa ruziziensis evaluates many genotypes in initial phases. Evaluations through grades might make the selection less costly. The aim of this study was to verify the efficiency of visual selection for green biomass yield in relation to different selection strategies, such as mass selection by phenotypic mean, BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) and at random. For this purpose, 2,309 regular genotypes were evaluated in an augmented block design in two cuts. The evaluators gave gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average estimate of commercial biomass productivity (mass of leaves and thin branches < 7 mm) based on visual estimation, was underestimated by approximately 25% in Guatambu and 5% in Chapecó compared to the biomass measured on a scale. Visual estimation is a low-cost alternative that requires less work to qualitatively define the production of individuals (Teixeira et al, 2020). However, its efficiency is strongly related to the traits of high heritability, as well as to the degree of training of the evaluator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average estimate of commercial biomass productivity (mass of leaves and thin branches < 7 mm) based on visual estimation, was underestimated by approximately 25% in Guatambu and 5% in Chapecó compared to the biomass measured on a scale. Visual estimation is a low-cost alternative that requires less work to qualitatively define the production of individuals (Teixeira et al, 2020). However, its efficiency is strongly related to the traits of high heritability, as well as to the degree of training of the evaluator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in both cases (selecting versus discarding), it is important to consider that perennial grass breeding programs have a peculiar regrowth evaluation (Berchembrock et al 2020), which limits the number of generations and selection cycles on a per year basis. Various forage breeding programs have used visual evaluation to assess traits at different stages of selection cycles for crops such as red clover (Riday 2009), U. ruziziensis (Souza Sobrinho et al 2010, Teixeira et al 2020, U. decumbens (Matias et al 2020), U. humidicola (Figueiredo et al 2019), and Urochloa spp. (Gouveia et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gouveia et al 2020). Teixeira et al (2020) showed the effectiveness of visual selection for green biomass yield based on plant vigor in U. ruziziensis. Souza Sobrinho et al (2010) also highlighted the efficiency of visual evaluation in U. ruziziensis by indirectly selecting genotypes resistant to spittlebugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, phenotyping for forage yield traits is performed by low-cost inaccurate visual evaluations [7] or by high-cost low throughput measurements [8]. For the latter strategy, samples are air-forced dried in a drying chamber to calculate DMY.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%