2016
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v38i3.28689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Modeling citrus huanglongbing data using a zero-inflated negative binomial distribution

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Zero-inflated data from field experiments can be problematic, as these data require the use of specific statistical models during the analysis process. This study utilized the zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model with the log-and logistic-link functions to describe the incidence of plants with Huanglongbing (HLB, caused by Candidatus liberibacter spp.) in commercial citrus orchards in the Northwestern Parana State, Brazil. Each orchard was evaluated at different times. The ZINB model with ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Folha Murcha IAC and IPR Folha Murcha have showed lower incidence of HLB-affected trees compared to Pera sweet orange under the same conditions of our field trial (Almeida et al, 2016). Lower HLB incidence in these two selections may be explained by the delayed bud break (Cantuarias-Avilés et al, 2011), the longer period to produce new shoots in early spring (Carvalho et al, 2021c), associated to the morphological characteristics of the curling leaves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Folha Murcha IAC and IPR Folha Murcha have showed lower incidence of HLB-affected trees compared to Pera sweet orange under the same conditions of our field trial (Almeida et al, 2016). Lower HLB incidence in these two selections may be explained by the delayed bud break (Cantuarias-Avilés et al, 2011), the longer period to produce new shoots in early spring (Carvalho et al, 2021c), associated to the morphological characteristics of the curling leaves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%