2015
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v37i4.19746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Hierarchical genetic clusters for phenotypic analysis

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Methods to obtain phenotypic information were evaluated to help breeders choosing the best methodology for analysis of genetic diversity in backcross populations. Phenotypes were simulated for 13 characteristics generated in 10 populations with 100 individuals each. Genotypic information was generated from 100 loci of which 20 were taken at random to determine the characteristics expressing two alleles. Dissimilarity measures were calculated, and genetic diversity was analyzed through hierarchical cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This clustering further underscores the substantial variability among the assessed accessions, and importantly, no duplicates were identified. The cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCC) was 86.86%, indicating a robust correlation and, in turn, suggesting that no significant distortions exist in the representation of similarity between individuals in the formed dendrogram (MATTA et al, 2015). It is worth noting that CCC values above 80% are considered satisfactory, as they indicate distortion below 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This clustering further underscores the substantial variability among the assessed accessions, and importantly, no duplicates were identified. The cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCC) was 86.86%, indicating a robust correlation and, in turn, suggesting that no significant distortions exist in the representation of similarity between individuals in the formed dendrogram (MATTA et al, 2015). It is worth noting that CCC values above 80% are considered satisfactory, as they indicate distortion below 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results, qualitative in nature, are usually presented as a dendrogram, making it possible to visualize the clusters and correlations among samples or variables. In HCA, the Euclidean distances between samples or variables are calculated and transformed into a similarity matrix whose elements are similarity indexes ranging from 0 to 1; a smaller distance means a larger index and therefore, greater similarity [57]. For hierarchical cluster analysis, the Ward's linkage method with squared Euclidean distance as a measure of similarity was applied to the dataset.…”
Section: Statistical Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hierarchical cluster analysis the dataset was treated with the Ward's method of linkage with squared Euclidean distance as a measure of similarity. The quality of the dendrogram obtained after HCA was evaluated by the co-phenetic correlation coe cient, which represents a statistical criterion widely used, selecting the hierarchical clustering method when there is no prior knowledge of the pattern of clustering (Matta et al 2015).…”
Section: Statistical Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%