2021
DOI: 10.37496/rbz5020200254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of row spacing and maturity at harvest on the fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and nutritional characteristics of biomass sorghum (BRS 716) silage in the semiarid region of Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference between strategies for NDF content in the pre-grazing period. Both NDF contents were above the minimum required of 55-60% in forage-based diets (Van Soest, 1994;Monção et al, 2019;2020;Queiroz e al., 2021). The pre-grazing ADF and lignin contents, and post-grazing NDF and ADF contents were 5.99; 15.91; 4.37 and 6.44% higher in LI strategy than in HI, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no difference between strategies for NDF content in the pre-grazing period. Both NDF contents were above the minimum required of 55-60% in forage-based diets (Van Soest, 1994;Monção et al, 2019;2020;Queiroz e al., 2021). The pre-grazing ADF and lignin contents, and post-grazing NDF and ADF contents were 5.99; 15.91; 4.37 and 6.44% higher in LI strategy than in HI, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated rate of particle passage in the rumen was estimated at 5% h -1 , as suggested by the Agricultural and Food Research Council [AFRC] (1993). Detail on the fermentation profile and nutritional value of the produced silage can be found in Queiroz et al (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the harvest age, the row planting spacing also affects the productivity and nutritional value of sorghum biomass (May et al, 2016). This is because the spacing between planting rows alters the plant ability to capture light, which can influence the productive, structural and nutritional characteristics of the forage (i.e., stem elongation, thick cell wall, lower concentration of soluble carbohydrates), in addition to interfering with the fermentation process (Borreani, Tabacco, Schmidt, Holmes, & Muck, 2018;Queiroz et al, 2021). There is no information in the literature on planting spacing and the best age for cutting biomass sorghum BRS 716 regarding this management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, there is a growing need for the search for forage alternatives with high productive potential and adapted to climatic conditions, aiming at the sustainability of production systems with ruminant animals (Borges et al, 2019;Queiroz et al, 2021). In this sense, millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atrazine herbicide was used to control invasive plants. Millet and BRS-716 biomass sorghum were managed and harvested 122 and 164 days after planting (Queiroz et al, 2021), respectively. The dry matter yield of millet was 10.90 t/ha and that of biomass sorghum, 36.0 t/ha.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%