2020
DOI: 10.36783/18069657rbcs20200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methods for estimating lime requirement to attain desirable pH values in Brazilian soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second principal component (PC2) explained 16.5% of the variance in soil parameters and had greatest contributions (in descending order) from soil OM, exchangeable Al, CEC, potential acidity, Al saturation, and pH. These parameters all relate to soil pH buffering capacity (Teixeira, Alvarez, & Neves, 2020). The third principal component (PC3) (10.4% of variance in soil parameters) and the fourth principal component (PC4) (5.4% of variance in soil parameters) had the greatest contributions from remaining P sorption capacity ( S rem ) and K, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second principal component (PC2) explained 16.5% of the variance in soil parameters and had greatest contributions (in descending order) from soil OM, exchangeable Al, CEC, potential acidity, Al saturation, and pH. These parameters all relate to soil pH buffering capacity (Teixeira, Alvarez, & Neves, 2020). The third principal component (PC3) (10.4% of variance in soil parameters) and the fourth principal component (PC4) (5.4% of variance in soil parameters) had the greatest contributions from remaining P sorption capacity ( S rem ) and K, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the soil variables contributing to PC2-OM, exchangeable Al, CEC, potential acidity (H + Al), and Al F I G U R E 3 Boxplots of soybean yield response (g dry grain per plant) by site (A or B) and treatment (0, 50, and 100% of standard field P fertilization of 38 kg P ha −1 ) saturation (negatively correlated to PC2), as well as pH (positively correlated to PC2) ( Figure 2)-the observed effect appears to be related to differences in the degree to which liming has decreased soil acidity. Organic matter is the primary source of soil buffering capacity in Brazilian Oxisols (de Sá Mendonça, Rowell, Martins, & da Silva, 2006), and more lime is required for neutralization of soil acidity when soils have greater OM (Teixeira et al, 2020). Here, based on multiple regression, potential acidity (PA) was positively related to OM (p = .045) and clay (p = .080) (model: PA ∼ 0.06314 OM + 0.02190 clay -0.11098, multiple R 2 = .21, adjusted R 2 = .15, p = .041).…”
Section: Soybean Yield Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different methods for recommending liming, with empirical models based on the dose per area (Parecido et al, 2021) or base saturation (Raij, 1981). The latter is being the most used although criticized for the linearity between the soil pH and the limestone total neutralizing power (TNP) (Teixeira et al, 2020). Although the most common practice for acidity correction is liming, the application of Ca and Mg silicate in place of limestone has been carefully studied with satisfactory results (Deus et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exceed the agronomic limitations associated to the acidity of soils, they are treated with products that contribute calcium, magnesium or both (Ca and Mg), capable of reducing the acidity and increasing the pH of soils to a specific degree, depending on the neutralization value of the product (type of product and purity), the relative efficiency (particle diameter of the product), and the buffer capacity of the soil (Chimdi et al, 2012). However, although the technical foundations that determine the effectiveness of liming products are known, the classic methods to establish the dose of lime do not consider the level of pH that is intended to be increased in the soil, since they are mostly based on the concentration of exchangeable aluminum or the degree of saturation of bases (Teixeira et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%