2005
DOI: 10.2223/1280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the nutritional status at 40 weeks corrected gestational age in a cohort of very low birth weight infants

Abstract: The most effective means of preventing babies being malnourished at term is by encouraging perinatal practices aimed at preventing restricted intrauterine growth, in addition to giving priority to aggressive nutritional management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
10
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
10
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other studies [12,16] on post natal malnutrition, female sex, lower birth weight, lower gestation at birth, poor in utero growth and infant sickness significantly contributed to malnutrition at term in VLBW infants. In this study prolonged oxygen requirement and prolonged hospitalization are indirect markers of infant sickness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to other studies [12,16] on post natal malnutrition, female sex, lower birth weight, lower gestation at birth, poor in utero growth and infant sickness significantly contributed to malnutrition at term in VLBW infants. In this study prolonged oxygen requirement and prolonged hospitalization are indirect markers of infant sickness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The lower prevalence of malnutrition in the present study may be attributed to early and aggressive enteral nutrition, ad libitum spoon or palade feeds and universal policy of Kangaroo Mother Care. In this study, the mean time to achieve full enteral feeds was 7.2±4.7 days and it was delayed by nearly 1 week (13.5 days) in the study by Gianini et al at [12] and by 1 to 2 weeks (median of 15 and 20 days in the conventional and aggressive nutritional groups respectively) in the study by Dinerstein et al [13]. However, the difference may also be attributed to the differences in study population, nutritional and feeding practices [14] and use of different reference growth charts [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kuzma et al [10] indicated that development and implementation of evidence-based nutrition support practices in neonates leads to improved nutrient intake and growth, with reduced duration of hospital stay and related costs. Gianini et al [7] reported that being born at a unit with aggressive nutritional support techniques reduced the risk of malnutrition at term by 2.17 times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%