1994
DOI: 10.1590/ts.v6i1/2.84955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reprodução do capital na frente pioneira e o renascimento da escravidão no Brasil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
18

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…For social scientists (sociologists and criminologists), however, this definition does not fit the complexity of the term, since they are oriented towards the description of standards for these behaviors, their cause and societies attitudes in face of the crime (PAYNE, 2012). Alexander and Cohen (1999) and Simpson and Piquero (2002) According to Schrager and Short Jr. (1978), the victims of white-collar crime are described in three categories: employees (high levels of risk, illegal work conditions, exposure to substances and conditions whose potential, long-term effects re unknown); consumers (harmful and hazardous products); and the public in general, which suffers the impacts of processes Disagreeing with the term "condition analogous to slavery", because he considers it actual slavery, Martins (1994) discusses one of the slave forms of labor relations found in capitalist society, slavery by debt, as the extreme variation of salary-based labor in conditions of over exploitation of the worker, to the point of compromising the individual's survival. Offering a sociological understanding of persistence and of revitalization of slave labor in Brazil, Martins (1994, pg.…”
Section: Corporations Ideology In Corporations and White-collar Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For social scientists (sociologists and criminologists), however, this definition does not fit the complexity of the term, since they are oriented towards the description of standards for these behaviors, their cause and societies attitudes in face of the crime (PAYNE, 2012). Alexander and Cohen (1999) and Simpson and Piquero (2002) According to Schrager and Short Jr. (1978), the victims of white-collar crime are described in three categories: employees (high levels of risk, illegal work conditions, exposure to substances and conditions whose potential, long-term effects re unknown); consumers (harmful and hazardous products); and the public in general, which suffers the impacts of processes Disagreeing with the term "condition analogous to slavery", because he considers it actual slavery, Martins (1994) discusses one of the slave forms of labor relations found in capitalist society, slavery by debt, as the extreme variation of salary-based labor in conditions of over exploitation of the worker, to the point of compromising the individual's survival. Offering a sociological understanding of persistence and of revitalization of slave labor in Brazil, Martins (1994, pg.…”
Section: Corporations Ideology In Corporations and White-collar Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many Internet users manifested the understanding of a historical concept of slave workers, where the stereotype has the slave in chains, revealing a misconception of the contemporary form of this phenomenon, according to Martins (1994). Today, the employer chains the worker offering minimal conditions for survival since his replacement entails no major cost.…”
Section: Final Remarks About the Conceptions Of White-collar Crime Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No tocante às relações de trabalho, presencia-se o acirramento do processo de expulsão dos antigos colonos das fazendas, tendo como um de seus resultados a gradativa substituição das relações de trabalho como o colonato, os moradores, a meação, a parceria e a recriação, em outros momentos, destas antigas relações de trabalho e de formas escravistas (Martins, 1995) concomitante à propagação do trabalho assalariado.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Forjadas por relações patriarcais e por uma herança escravocrata, unidas à concentração fundiária, promovida e regulamentada pelo Estado sob a égide de uma modernização, marca indelével do poder do latifúndio no Brasil, e pautadas pela desproteção do trabalhador rural, as relações de trabalho no campo brasileiro são o resultado do complexo processo histórico, econômico, social e cultural que se amparou e que, concomitantemente e viciosamente, resultou na recorrente espoliação da força de trabalho através de uma sobreexploração (quase) sem limites (MARTINS, 1980;1995).…”
unclassified