Knowledge and attitudes of official inspectors at slaughterhouses in southern Brazil regarding animal welfare

Abstract

We assessed the views, knowledge, and attitudes of livestock inspectors working in federally inspected slaughterhouses in southern Brazil, the major pig and poultry processors in the country, regarding farm animal behavior and welfare, and factors that may influence animal welfare improvements at abattoirs. An online questionnaire with closed and open questions was sent to all the federally inspected slaughterhouses in the three states of the region. All respondents (n = 83) strongly agreed that animals are capable of feeling pain, but fewer agreed that animals have mental states and individual temperament, or that animals can feel boredom or frustration. In the assessment of respondents, professionals in Brazil receive insufficient training in animal welfare; most believe that stockpeople do not understand the relationship between animal welfare and meat quality. Furthermore, most respondents believe that stockpeople are not satisfied with their working conditions at slaughterhouses and are not motivated to adopt practices to improve animal welfare. Respondents reported positive attitudes towards animal welfare but insufficient understanding and training on animal welfare during professional education. The three main actions that, according to the respondents, are required to successfully implement humane slaughter in Brazil are better selection and greater valorization of the stockpeople by the industry; refinements of the legislation to indicate minimum and maximum standards for specific species, practices, and outcomes; and introduction of animal welfare as a topic during the professional training of professionals that will oversee and support the implementation of humane practices in slaughterhouses.

Linking Animal Welfare and Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming—A Review

“…The reduction in staff/animals derived from intensification and the restriction of contact with humans with the advent of automated systems have contributed to more aversive reactions in routine management, poor handling, and negative interactions [ 27 ]. The intensification of livestock production also added problems, such as unskilled, often unmotivated workers due to high turnover, low pay, and lack of sufficient training [ 28 , 29 ]. Therefore, negative human–animal interactions at the farm may contribute to increased susceptibility to disease by activating energy-costly stress responses, especially when these interactions are persistent or frequent.…”

Directionality and systemic governance : Lessons from Brazilian pig system transformations from the 1960s to date

“…For instance, systemic interfaces between science, policy, and practice were fundamental to implement the vertical coordination production model, which reshaped the Brazilian pig production development pathway from the late 1980s onwards (Guimarães et al, 2017;Sebrae, 2016). Moreover, the collaboration between varied intermediaries has been pivotal to deploy animal welfare international standards in Brazilian pig production (Dias et al, 2018;Hötzel et al, 2018). Hence, the pig sector in Brazil also offers an attractive setting to investigate the role of ecologies of intermediaries in the establishment of alternative development pathways in agri-food systems.…”

Regrouping stress in confined heifers

“…However, despite the benefits of feedlots, research shows that consumers are increasingly demanding animal traceability and have growing concerns about the welfare of animals raised in confined systems (HÖTZEL et al, 2018).…”