2021
DOI: 10.1590/rbce.43.e012820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between upper and lower limbs muscle explosive strength with the vastus lateralis and biceps brachii architecture

Abstract: We aimed to assess upper and lower limbs explosive strength, and its correlation with biceps brachii (BB) and vastus lateralis (VL) architecture. Absolute and maximum torque normalized rate of torque development (RTD) were measured from isometric elbow flexion (EF) and knee extension (KE). BB and VL architectures were assessed by ultrasound. Absolute RTD of KE was higher (129–272%), although normalized RTD was higher in EF (80-21%). The absolute RTD was correlated to muscle thickness only in the BB (r=.39-46).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study in women and those of Keller et al [13] in men suggest that there may be muscle-, task-, and/or sex-specific differences for the effects of anchor scheme on TTF during sustained, isometric tasks. The bilateral leg extensions used in Keller et al [13] involved greater engaged muscle mass [51,52] that produced more torque (or force) at RPE = 8 [53,54] than the unilateral forearm flexion tasks in the present study. Perhaps, these differences resulted in musclespecific metabolic responses to fatigue related to muscle oxygenation, ATP utilization, and metabolite buildup [55,56], which influenced the effect of the anchor scheme on TTF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The results of the present study in women and those of Keller et al [13] in men suggest that there may be muscle-, task-, and/or sex-specific differences for the effects of anchor scheme on TTF during sustained, isometric tasks. The bilateral leg extensions used in Keller et al [13] involved greater engaged muscle mass [51,52] that produced more torque (or force) at RPE = 8 [53,54] than the unilateral forearm flexion tasks in the present study. Perhaps, these differences resulted in musclespecific metabolic responses to fatigue related to muscle oxygenation, ATP utilization, and metabolite buildup [55,56], which influenced the effect of the anchor scheme on TTF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%