2021
DOI: 10.1590/pboci.2021.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Clinical Operative Technique on Debris Extrusion of Two Reciprocating Files

Abstract: Objective: To compare the influence of different clinical operative motions (pecking motion vs. MIMERACI) on apical debris extrusion using WaveOne Gold and EdgeOne Fire reciprocating files in the mesiobuccal canal of extracted molars. Material and Methods: Sixty mandibular molar teeth with curvature less than 20° were divided into 4 groups (n=15 each): G1A: WOG pecking Group; G1B: WOG MIMERACI Group; G2A: EOF pecking Group; and G2B: EOF MIMERACI Group. The produced debris was collected in the preweighed Eppend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Debris expulsion from the apical foramen in the course of the biomechanical preparation of the root canal has been associated with post-operative pain [ 2 ]. Such debris may include microorganisms, irrigating solutions, infected dentin particles and pulpal tissue remnants, and their extrusion could depend on different factors; among those, the instrumentation strategies and irrigation play a crucial role [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debris expulsion from the apical foramen in the course of the biomechanical preparation of the root canal has been associated with post-operative pain [ 2 ]. Such debris may include microorganisms, irrigating solutions, infected dentin particles and pulpal tissue remnants, and their extrusion could depend on different factors; among those, the instrumentation strategies and irrigation play a crucial role [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, over the years, several limitations have been highlighted. Firstly, reciprocating instruments have been criticized for the possibility of extruding debris and bacteria in the periapical space in comparison to continuous rotary instrumentation [3,7,8]. Despite this, to date, the literature includes conflicting results, so further studies are needed [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%